Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #130674
| From | Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: Is a self-contained upgrade considered large/disruptive? (was Re: Bug#1102599: rust-tonic: please upgrade to 0.13 with upcoming upgrade of rust-prost 0.13) |
| Date | 2025-04-12 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KAGAV-cXWs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KA5UJ-cA9t-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <KA64p-cAdi-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KAokF-cMev-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Blair,
On 11-04-2025 17:14, Blair Noctis wrote:
> So:
> If all packages affected are handled ("self-contained"),
This is indeed good.
> the blast radius is rather small,
In transition context, we generally consider "small" when numbers are in
the low single digit. Otherwise we'd want to be involved/informed. That
always true, but more so during the transition freeze of course. By the
way, our definition of transition is broader than the classical
C-library transition, and covers changes to packages that require
changes to or rebuilds of other packages.
> and I have the go from all affected maintainers,
That's obviously also good.
> is it still considered large/disruptive?
It's at least against the spirit of the freeze, see our definition of
transition above.
> Ramacher said it depends on the size of debdiffs,
> so here they are:
> https://people.debian.org/~ncts/rust-prost-0.13-affected-debdiffs/
> (Cargo.lock stripped as it's basically dead weight)
If you want to request an exception, please file a bug and attach
debdiffs to the report. That way they are stored in the BTS. Having said
that, the size of those debdiffs don't look good. That's not really
reviewable. So you better have a good explanation of why the new version
is so much better than the current version in trixie. Otherwise consider
this request as just too late.
Paul
Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is a self-contained upgrade considered large/disruptive? (was Re: Bug#1102599: rust-tonic: please upgrade to 0.13 with upcoming upgrade of rust-prost 0.13) Blair Noctis <ncts@debian.org> - 2025-04-11 17:20 +0200
Re: Is a self-contained upgrade considered large/disruptive? (was Re: Bug#1102599: rust-tonic: please upgrade to 0.13 with upcoming upgrade of rust-prost 0.13) Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2025-04-12 12:50 +0200
Re: Is a self-contained upgrade considered large/disruptive? (was Re: Bug#1102599: rust-tonic: please upgrade to 0.13 with upcoming upgrade of rust-prost 0.13) Blair Noctis <ncts@debian.org> - 2025-04-12 17:40 +0200
csiph-web