Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel > #113519

Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution

From László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel
Subject Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution
Date 2024-09-26 21:20 +0200
Message-ID <Jr2bT-f1CT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JqGl3-eNB3-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:46 PM Bernd Schubert
<bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a
> distribution?
 In what sense? Upstream ABI breakages don't help, I wait for 3.17 at
least if that helps - not upgrading it to middle versions.

> As you can see here https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/pull/1038
> there are some arguments not to do so.
> The pull request above explains why and adds even more breakage,
> when we already have chance for that. But it would be good to
> know how much trouble it is for a distribution.
 Debian doesn't recompile dependent packages for new releases. Doing
library transitions (due to new soname) is an everyday thing for us.
The workflow is documented [1], I will not repeat it here. There are
forty-two dependent packages that need to be rebuilt for such a case,
not a big number. I'm open to schedule the transition if upstream
changes the soname.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> - 2024-09-25 22:00 +0200
  Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-09-25 22:40 +0200
    Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-26 00:50 +0200
      Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-09-26 08:40 +0200
  Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> - 2024-09-26 21:20 +0200
    Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> - 2024-09-27 11:30 +0200

csiph-web