Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #113515
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution |
| Date | 2024-09-26 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <JqQkp-eUqi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JqGl3-eNB3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JqGXM-eO2L-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JqIZz-ePhM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:48:03AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > > > distribution? > > > > Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. > > > > "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages against a new > > library version, unless absolutely needed - if I'm right library ABI > > changes cause silent issues." sounds very wrong to me. We always > > recompile packages against a new soname when that is uploaded, and as we > > try to keep packages uptodate a new soname is normally uploaded every time > > it's bumped by the upstream. > > But we *don't* rebuild when there is not an soversion bump, so the > previous unintended ABI changes in libfuse3-3 may well have caused > silent issues for its reverse-dependencies. Right, when read like that it's correct. -- WBR, wRAR
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> - 2024-09-25 22:00 +0200
Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-09-25 22:40 +0200
Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2024-09-26 00:50 +0200
Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2024-09-26 08:40 +0200
Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org> - 2024-09-26 21:20 +0200
Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> - 2024-09-27 11:30 +0200
csiph-web