Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #273097
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes |
| Date | 2024-09-16 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <JnbGN-cCjP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <Jl4T7-bgM9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JmdhD-bYSL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JmdhD-bYSL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jmjn3-c2nU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Jn9Yl-cAXd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 10:47:46PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 08:33:55PM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: [rough dd test] > It's an invalid test because you hit the end of the device; there's nothing > left to sync. This doesn't make sense to me. The question was whether dd writes "raw" to the device or "buffered" (meaning that its output ends up in OS buffers to be flushed later). Since the whole thing (dd + OS) can't look into the future, stuff will end in buffers to be flushed if the second is the case, regardless on whether dd "hits the end of the device" or not. Those buffers would have to be flushed, thus showing up in sync's time. They do not, therefore I conclude that we have the first case. What am I missing? Cheers -- t
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-09-08 20:10 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-09-09 11:00 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-09-09 15:40 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-09-10 11:00 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-09-13 14:10 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-09-13 20:40 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-09-16 04:50 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-09-16 06:40 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-09-13 21:10 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-09-14 01:40 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-09-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-09-16 11:20 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-09-16 12:50 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-09-16 13:00 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-09-16 13:20 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes "Rick Thomas" <rick.thomas@pobox.com> - 2024-09-13 23:20 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-09-16 21:20 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-09-16 05:00 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-09-16 12:20 +0200
Re: Disk drive zero-fill benchmarks for various synchronization methods and block sizes Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-09-16 13:40 +0200
csiph-web