Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #369861
| From | Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.rc |
| Subject | Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue |
| Date | 2024-08-16 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <JbZSF-5mZR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <J007L-1YKz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JahK2-4j0P-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JahK2-4j0P-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <IPXEd-3lgJ-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <JahK2-4j0P-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:23:43PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >Hi, > >On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:21 PM Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Aron, >> >> On 14-07-2024 07:37, Paul Gevers wrote: >> > On 28-06-2024 5:44 a.m., Aron Xu wrote: >> >> Would like to know if such steps would help resolve the issue better: >> >> - revert to a previous version which does not have API/ABI breakage >> >> - apply/port security patches on a best effort basis >> >> - help upstream to check and fix API/ABI changes >> > >> > I think all three would help, where the first one is the quickest one to >> > get things moving again. Given the severity of the security issue >> > mentioned in the changelog I think you could even consider ignoring item >> > number two for now, but maybe you mean going forward. >> > >> >> Or do you have any recommendations? >> > >> > There is the option to do a Debian specific SONAME bump, but if the >> > break was not intended and might get reverted that's probably a bad >> > idea. And if the changes are here to stay, upstream should bump SONAME >> > themselves. >> >> While the upstream bug about the soname breakage seems to have halted, >> can we please get some resolution in Debian please? The fact that >> libxml2 can't migrate as-is is hurting more and more (particularly the >> creation of a useful testing for riscv64). >> >> If upstream is really reluctant to bump SONAME when they should, maybe >> you should prepare for a maintenance scheme to do that in Debian when >> needed. Ideally the scheme should be designed such that when upstream >> bumps SONAME, you can follow them again. >> > >Thanks for pinging again! > >I was busy with $dayjob during the last week, will come up with a >solution this week and possibly talk to you on IRC/email about my >plan. If there is a lot of more extra work here, I am happy to take on some work if I can help. Thanks, BR, Bo > >Regards, >Aron > -- Regards, -- Bo YU
Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1073313: gnustep-base: FTBFS: GSXML.m:2674:22: error: ‘xmlEntity’ {aka ‘struct _xmlEntity’} has no member named ‘checked’ Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 15:00 +0200
Processed: Re: Bug#1073313: gnustep-base: FTBFS: GSXML.m:2674:22: error: ‘xmlEntity’ {aka ‘struct _xmlEntity’} has no member named ‘checked’ "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-06-16 18:50 +0200
Bug#1073313: gnustep-base: FTBFS: GSXML.m:2674:22: error: ‘xmlEntity’ {aka ‘struct _xmlEntity’} has no member named ‘checked’ Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> - 2024-06-16 19:10 +0200
Bug#1073313: another libxml2 ABI break, might need RM attention (Re: Bug#1073313: gnustep-base: FTBFS: GSXML.m:2674:22: error: ‘xmlEntity’ {aka ‘struct _xmlEntity’} has no member named ‘checked’) Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> - 2024-06-16 19:20 +0200
Bug#1073508: libxml2: just another API+ABI break; please bump soname Aron Xu <aron@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 09:50 +0200
Bug#1073508: libxml2: just another API+ABI break; please bump soname Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@qvest-digital.com> - 2024-06-17 16:50 +0200
Processed: Re: libxml2: just another API+ABI break; please bump soname "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-06-17 09:50 +0200
Bug#1073313: marked as done (gnustep-base: FTBFS: GSXML.m:2674:22: error: ‘xmlEntity’ {aka ‘struct _xmlEntity’} has no member named ‘checked’) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-06-19 11:30 +0200
Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue Aron Xu <aron@debian.org> - 2024-08-11 16:30 +0200
Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> - 2024-08-16 09:50 +0200
Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue Aron Xu <aron@debian.org> - 2024-08-17 08:30 +0200
Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue Aron Xu <aron@debian.org> - 2024-08-17 14:10 +0200
Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue Aron Xu <aron@debian.org> - 2024-08-21 13:40 +0200
Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-08-21 19:50 +0200
Bug#1073508: marked as done (libxml2: just another API+ABI break; please bump soname) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-09-26 18:00 +0200
Bug#1073508: is this really fixed? looks like not yet Francesco Potortì <Potorti@isti.cnr.it> - 2024-12-17 14:40 +0100
csiph-web