Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1225245
| From | pini@debian.org |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 |
| Date | 2024-12-22 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JWxtb-1BUV-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <JWheF-1r7F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWsWt-1zgT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWsWt-1zgT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JNTCx-cigm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JWsWt-1zgT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Le 2024-12-22 12:59, pini@debian.org a écrit : > Le 2024-12-22 09:07, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> On 22-12-2024 00:36, pini@debian.org wrote: >>>> There are a few autopkgtest regressions. I briefly looked at fast5 >>>> and it looks like its examples need changes for the new API. I >>>> haven't looked at the others. Can you take a look and file bugs as >>>> appropriate? >> >>> * fclib: autopkgtest is successful on my box >> >> I assume you test in a pure unstable/sid environment. Indeed on ci.d.n >> fclib also passes on unstable. Most of the times that means we're >> missing a *versioned* (test-) Depends or Breaks somewhere. The test >> infrastructure tries to test in a testing/trixie environment with as >> little as possible from unstable. Do you have any idea what that could >> be? >> >>> * fenics-dolfinx: autopkgtest is successful on my box >> >> Same. >> >>> * gatb-core: autopkgtest is successful on my box >> >> Same. >> >>> * petsc: autopkgtest is successful on my box >> >> Same. > > Should I upload a new HDF5 revision with versioned `Breaks:` against > these packages? As I understand it the failing test for fclib depends on libfclib-dev which brings the transitioning libhdf5-dev. This leads to an executable linked to both libhdf5_serial_hl.so.100 and libhdf5_serial_hl.so.310, causing the failure. What is the best practice to prevent this? I thought about adding `Breaks: libfclib-dev (<< 3.1.0+dfsg-3+b4)` to libhdf5-dev but it seems inappropriable because the binNMU number is not the same for all architectures. Best, _g.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org> - 2024-11-28 21:50 +0100
Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 pini@debian.org - 2024-12-08 15:50 +0100
Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 pini@debian.org - 2024-12-10 22:20 +0100
Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 pini@debian.org - 2024-12-22 00:40 +0100
Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 pini@debian.org - 2024-12-22 13:10 +0100
Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5 pini@debian.org - 2024-12-22 18:00 +0100
csiph-web