Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1224050
| From | Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.cd |
| Subject | Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs |
| Date | 2024-12-15 04:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JTNb3-h709-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JveHv-9RR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JF2F3-6y2b-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JveHv-9RR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JF2F3-6y2b-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Sorry this has taken so long - I've been swamped IRL :-( On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 04:25:03AM -0600, Daniel Lewart wrote: >On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 02:00:00 -0500, I wrote: > >> linux-image is version 6.10.11-1, but there are multiple versions >> of module udebs in the pool. E.g.: >> * btrfs-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb >> * btrfs-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb >> * btrfs-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb >> * btrfs-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb >> * crc-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb >> * crc-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb >> * crc-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb >> * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb >> * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb >> * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb >> * crypto-dm-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb >> >> Is there any reason to have non-6.10.11-1 versions of the module udebs? > >Now linux-image is version 6.11.5-1, and the bloat keeps increasing: > * btrfs-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.11.4-amd64-di_6.11.4-1_amd64.udeb > * btrfs-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di_6.11.5-1_amd64.udeb > * crc-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb > * crc-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb > * crc-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.11.4-amd64-di_6.11.4-1_amd64.udeb > * crypto-dm-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di_6.11.5-1_amd64.udeb >... I think there's a problem here in (the archive|the kernel packaging), as far as I can see. Look at https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/linux-signed-amd64 and you'll see that right now the linux-signed-amd64 (6.12.3+1) source package claims to build modules for all of the following kernel ABIs. Picking crypto-dm-modules-* as an example: * crypto-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.4-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.4-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.6-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.6-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.7-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.7-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.9-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.9-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.10-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.11.10-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.12.3-amd64-di * crypto-modules-6.12.3-amd64-di debian-cd just pulls in all the modules in a release, expecting that to be a sensible set. WTH is happening here? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James D. Nicoll
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-12-15 04:10 +0100
Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-12-15 04:20 +0100
Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-12-15 04:50 +0100
Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-12-15 20:10 +0100
Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-12-15 23:30 +0100
Bug#1088605: Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-12-15 23:30 +0100
Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2024-12-16 23:10 +0100
Bug#1088605: Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 00:10 +0100
Bug#1084789: Bug#1088605: Bug#1084789: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-12-17 02:50 +0100
csiph-web