Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #275311
| From | gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: ext4 FS Crash |
| Date | 2024-12-05 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JQrA5-e04Z-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <JQetb-dRS7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQgY1-dTtj-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQiQ9-dUCh-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQjjb-dULp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <JQkyB-dVr6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 12/5/24 08:55, Klaus Singvogel wrote: > gene heskett wrote: >> On 12/5/24 06:59, Klaus Singvogel wrote: >>> >>> It can be fixed by a Firmware upgrade, and more recently charges of Samsung SSD 980 PRO are flashed/sold with a good Firmware out-of-the-box. >> While I am saying that my results with earlier Samsung have been less than >> glorious. triple layer nand's turning into half capacity for instance. > > In my memory, the PRO version of Samsung SSDs (not: NVMe) survived the test of a reputable website - many years ago. All other SSDs died when the article was written, except the Samsung PRO SSD. Their test continued. > > But, on the other hand, the regular version (no PRO in the name) of the Samsung SSD died first in the test. > > I think the data written to the Samsung SSD in the test exceeded twice the MTBF rate, several hundred TB. > > But I also noticed that the quality of Samsung SSDs has adapted to the quality of their competitors (not in the good way). I read a lot about the 980 PRO and the Firmware debacle, but also heard that the 990 PRO shouldn't be any better. The memory business is very competitive, so this doesn't surprise me. We've come a long way since the tv station I was working for pair $400 for a 4 static memory to populate an 1802 based S100 board. We call todays slap it together and get it out the door attitude the bblb syndrome. So my next experiment is to destry > > Best regards, > Klaus. Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ext4 FS Crash Daniel Harris <mail.dharris@googlemail.com> - 2024-12-04 13:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> - 2024-12-04 13:50 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Eike Lantzsch ZP5CGE / KY4PZ <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2024-12-04 15:40 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2024-12-04 19:20 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 17:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net> - 2024-12-04 17:50 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Daniel Harris <mail.dharris@googlemail.com> - 2024-12-04 18:20 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-05 00:50 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Daniel Harris <mail.dharris@googlemail.com> - 2024-12-05 12:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-05 13:40 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Daniel Harris <mail.dharris@googlemail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:40 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-12-05 10:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2024-12-05 16:40 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-12-05 17:10 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-12-06 02:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-05 18:50 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-12-06 14:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-06 15:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2024-12-06 15:10 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 17:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-06 17:40 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 17:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-08 18:20 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 04:50 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Daniel Harris <mail.dharris@googlemail.com> - 2025-01-13 16:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 22:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net> - 2024-12-05 08:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-12-05 11:10 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net> - 2024-12-05 13:10 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-12-05 13:40 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2024-12-05 14:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net> - 2024-12-05 15:00 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-12-05 22:30 +0100
Re: ext4 FS Crash Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-12-04 18:20 +0100
csiph-web