Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.devel.mentors > #46869

Re: Bug#1078069: RFS: fennel/1.5.0-1 [ITP] -- Lisp-based programming language for the Lua runtime

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Phil,

On Friday, August 9, 2024 8:59:01 AM MST Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> writes:
> >> I will see if I can get gbp to pull from a branch where this deletion
> >> has already been committed manually in git instead of relying on it to
> >> filter out the pristine-tarball.
> > 
> > It should handle it (it does for the electrum package).  Are you running
> > `gbp
> > import-orig --uscan`?
> 
> No, I'm using gbp pull as per
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/bandali/fennel/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/
README.Deb
> ian?ref_type=heads

Interesting.  I don’t have any personal experience with `gbp pull`, but I 
would imagine the idea is for it to respect Files-Excluded.  Perhaps you might 
want to file a bug.

> Yes, I'm already using dh_auto_clean; it's being invoked by pbuilder, but
> it has no effect either when run from pbuilder or when invoked by
> hand. On IRC someone speculated that its heuristics were getting
> confused by my Makefile; I don't know if this is accurate but it seems
> to not be doing what it's supposed to do.

The documentation does say it only works in about 90% of cases.

"This is intended to work for about 90% of packages. If it doesn't work, or 
tries to use the wrong clean target, you're encouraged to skip using 
dh_auto_clean at all, and just run make clean manually.”

https://manpages.debian.org/jessie/debhelper/dh_auto_clean.1.en.html

If you desire you might file a bug report and see if they can figure out how to 
parse your Makefile.  Otherwise, it looks like your solution is exactly what is 
recommended.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Back to linux.debian.devel.mentors | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

  Re: Bug#1078069: RFS: fennel/1.5.0-1 [ITP] -- Lisp-based programming language  for the Lua runtime Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2024-08-09 05:30 +0200
  Re: Bug#1078069: RFS: fennel/1.5.0-1 [ITP] -- Lisp-based  programming language for the Lua runtime Phil Hagelberg <phil@hagelb.org> - 2024-08-09 18:10 +0200
      Re: Bug#1078069: RFS: fennel/1.5.0-1 [ITP] -- Lisp-based programming language  for the Lua runtime Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2024-08-09 18:30 +0200

csiph-web