Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1195645
| From | Brian May <bam@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1070031: heimdal-kdc: fails to install if /usr/bin/kadmin is not Heimdal kadmin |
| Date | 2024-04-29 08:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Iysdr-9Kws-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IylOF-9FHA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IylOF-9FHA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
Ryan Tandy <ryan@nardis.ca> writes: > # update-alternatives --display kadmin > kadmin - auto mode > link best version is /usr/bin/kadmin.mit > link currently points to /usr/bin/kadmin.mit > link kadmin is /usr/bin/kadmin > slave kadmin.1.gz is /usr/share/man/man1/kadmin.1.gz > /usr/bin/kadmin.heimdal - priority 23 > slave kadmin.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/kadmin.heimdal.1.gz > /usr/bin/kadmin.mit - priority 30 > slave kadmin.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/kadmin.mit.1.gz I am wondering if maybe kadmin should not be using update-alternatives. I think it is policy - although I can't find it right now - that update alternatives should only be used for similar commands, i.e. similiar command line parsing, does the same thing, etc. But I don't think any of this applies for kadmin. It could be very confusing if you are kadmin by hand, not realizing you are running the wrong command. Any thoughts? Maybe I should ask the MIT kerberos maintainer for opinions here also. -- Brian May @ Debian
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1070031: heimdal-kdc: fails to install if /usr/bin/kadmin is not Heimdal kadmin Ryan Tandy <ryan@nardis.ca> - 2024-04-29 01:10 +0200 Bug#1070031: heimdal-kdc: fails to install if /usr/bin/kadmin is not Heimdal kadmin Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2024-04-29 08:00 +0200
csiph-web