Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1193669
| From | Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) |
| Date | 2024-04-10 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IrFIt-5lrd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <Ir6hI-4ZkR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <Irk1j-58je-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IrD3X-5k5z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ir6hI-4ZkR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <IrD3X-5k5z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Debian |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2024-04-10):
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:33:09PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > Hi Cyril,
> >
> > On Tuesday, 9 April 2024 01:06:43 CEST Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Upgrading from linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64 to linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64
> > > leads to losing some SMART information, at least as queried by munin (in
> > > Debian 12) when it comes to sensors.
> >
> > Does the problem go away if you revert the following commits on top of -19?
> >
> > db6338f45971b4285ea368432a84033690eaf53c
> > scsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock for waking up EH handler
> >
> > 1ebd75cefaac6fd74729a7d3157f6eaa59960ae2
> > scsi: core: Move scsi_host_busy() out of host lock if it is for per-command
> >
> > cf33e6ca12d814e1be2263cb76960d0019d7fb94
> > scsi: core: Add struct for args to execution functions
Preparing that test right now, thanks Diederik.
> Or if that does not find the culprit, would you be able to bisect the
> upstrema changes beweeen 6.1.76 and 6.1.82?
>
> There would be for instance the following ata related change:
>
> 4b085736e44d ("ata: libata-core: Do not try to set sleeping devices to standby")
>
> If you can test it with other kernels, does the same happens on
> 6.7.7-1 and 6.7.9-2?
I'm not really keen on playing kernel ping-pong on this particular
machine (which is important in my infrastructure), but I've verified
that adding a SATA disk to an existing VM running Debian 12 on a
QEMU/libvirt Debian 12 host gives me similar results with -18 and -19
kernels (some data in the former case, no data at all in the latter
one).
I think I'd rather stay with 6.1.y kernels if at all possible, to avoid
having to figure out other changes that might be possibly required to
cope with newer kernels.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-09 01:10 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2024-04-09 15:50 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 12:10 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 15:00 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 15:40 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 15:50 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 16:00 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 16:10 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 17:30 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 19:10 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 19:40 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 20:50 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-10 21:50 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2024-04-11 10:10 +0200
Bug#1068675: linux-image-6.1.0-19-amd64: loss of SMART information: Device is in SLEEP mode, exit(2) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2024-04-10 17:00 +0200
csiph-web