Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #268004
| From | Andre Rodier <andre@rodier.me> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org |
| Date | 2024-03-03 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <IdVap-e9I6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IdQDL-e6WV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <IdUHn-e9z2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/03/2024 14:06, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:39:42AM +0000, Andre Rodier wrote: >> I was checking the Debian domain, and noticed that it is DNSSEC compliant. >> >> However, when I check "deb.debian.org", the DNS validation fails. > > Things in the debian.org domain are responding correctly with DNSSEC > but deb.debian.org is a CNAME to debian.map.fastlydns.net, and > *that* domain doesn't (yet?) use DNSSEC. > > $ delv deb.debian.org > ; fully validated > deb.debian.org. 3600 IN CNAME debian.map.fastlydns.net. > deb.debian.org. 3600 IN RRSIG CNAME 8 3 3600 20240405180549 20240225172415 59788 debian.org. YnRgyoBEdwn9PHKTN9pIHNp+VyY+J0hripSOOV7feEsJmgfJwwslnsTR pC0QTkKZQlNflC2sPGqAc5/sKSHHGkHdKYemVCH7IcDTKOZ6wilVUlvT zumWhTZDk+ntLoptwmDblI6emnj8z8wimiFuyGv3+bU16RbdzdFvMdQI Ys9Ldyz6eQSMMyD58OwpiwDxFWjns92iUb05VB+yLeVeFwQ9uvJW1lZa oASmDhoyNijntU9UjA6h/Bzx6ZJvLHlE > > ; unsigned answer > debian.map.fastlydns.net. 30 IN A 146.75.74.132 > >> After checking the status using Verisign >> (https://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com/deb.debian.org), I understand >> Debian is using a CDN (Content Delivery Network). >> >> Is there a stable domain we can use that doesn't rely on a CDN, please ? > > I am left to wonder what problem(s) you are trying to avoid by "not > relying on a CDN", but you can just use a different mirror. > > But note that Debian mirrors are operated by many diverse > organisations and individuals, most of which probably aren't Debian > developers. Debian itself has no legal entity; SPI, inc only deals > with some financial matters, so trying to form a notion of any kind > of legislative or administrative control structure is difficult. > > Or to put it another way, if it bothers you that responsibility for > operation of a mirror passes outside of the people who control the > debian.org zone, I have bad news for you. > > For example, if you chose ftp.uk.debian.org… > > $ delv ftp.uk.debian.org > ; fully validated > ftp.uk.debian.org. 300 IN CNAME debian.hands.com. > ftp.uk.debian.org. 300 IN RRSIG CNAME 8 4 300 20240401002934 20240220235036 59788 debian.org. Pu+9FflqjMDfCjNxUoQy32dA5X3atU92LH3hozdZcDk3ZZwtyqcAoA6x IZSLZEzJvXa6+gTd3P0pOib+rIoypUYz47OulgYTWqQdLILtV3cRMVxU hf+z5xOYmOzzwSKAuI7iho4PNCmChccyfFdc3p4nKtciQmyWYbUeNJRu s83Ki0YEdvgMP+74HCwH6BNUEFhCuYFeDc+XWTzwg55EDSAmyMdXU9rl BRfpyCg4VU0NeJMFGci5sxKooAwbstvs > > ; unsigned answer > debian.hands.com. 14030 IN A 78.129.164.123 > > …you again end up at something that doesn't use DNSSEC. It isn't a > CDN though, so maybe you like it more (?). > > I haven't gone through all of the mirrors to see if there are any > ones that use DNSSEC. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some, > but again, I don't know what your threat model is so I'm not > suggesting this matters. > > Thanks, > Andy > Thanks for the answer, Andy. This make sense. Kind regards, André Rodier
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org Andre Rodier <andre@rodier.me> - 2024-03-03 10:50 +0100
Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-03-03 15:10 +0100
Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org Andre Rodier <andre@rodier.me> - 2024-03-03 15:30 +0100
Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-03-03 15:10 +0100
Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-03-03 15:30 +0100
Re: DNSSEC status of deb.debian.org Andre Rodier <andre@rodier.me> - 2024-03-03 15:40 +0100
csiph-web