Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #271072

Re: General questions

From 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: General questions
Date 2024-07-11 13:50 +0200
Message-ID <IZ0tb-1mc8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <IY4Ix-M4z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IY5EB-MCP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IY5Oh-MFO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IYNFE-1dMg-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <IYOBH-1euu-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Why 64 signatures not checked and no ultimately trusted keys found here:
$ gpg --import key-DA87E80D6294BE9B.txt
gpg: key DA87E80D6294BE9B: 64 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key DA87E80D6294BE9B: public key "Debian CD signing key
<debian-cd@lists.debian.org>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:               imported: 1
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found

And this:
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.

This is weird. Why Fedora does not have this, but Debian does.

And can you explain to me what is it, please?

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:00 AM Lee <ler762@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:07 PM 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, dear Debian Community.
> >
> > I just wanted to check a key with GPG.
> >
> > I have found this on https://www.debian.org/CD/verify:
> >
> > pub   rsa4096/DA87E80D6294BE9B 2011-01-05 [SC]
> >
> > Key fingerprint = DF9B 9C49 EAA9 2984 3258  9D76 DA87 E80D 6294 BE9B
> >
> > uid                  Debian CD signing key <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>
> >
> >
> > How can I download this key for GPG checking?
>
> Click on the link, that takes you to
>   https://www.debian.org/CD/key-DA87E80D6294BE9B.txt
> and save the file.  Then gpg --import it
>
> $ gpg --import key-DA87E80D6294BE9B.txt
> gpg: key DA87E80D6294BE9B: 64 signatures not checked due to missing keys
> gpg: key DA87E80D6294BE9B: public key "Debian CD signing key
> <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>" imported
> gpg: Total number processed: 1
> gpg:               imported: 1
> gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
>
> hrmmm... 64 signatures not checked due to missing keys due to missing
> keys doesn't look good, but you've got the key now.
>
> I checked by going to
> http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/debian-cd/12.6.0/amd64/iso-dvd/ and got
> the SHA512SUMS and SHA512SUMS.sign files.
> Verify them by
>
> $ gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS
> gpg: Signature made Sat Jun 29 16:50:24 2024 EDT
> gpg:                using RSA key DF9B9C49EAA9298432589D76DA87E80D6294BE9B
> gpg: Good signature from "Debian CD signing key
> <debian-cd@lists.debian.org>" [unknown]
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: DF9B 9C49 EAA9 2984 3258  9D76 DA87 E80D 6294 BE9B
>
> so the contents of SHA512SUMS are trustworthy.  Or as trustworthy as I
> can verify.. somebody else hopefully knows how to get all the missing
> keys and mark the DA87E80D6294BE9B key as trusted.
>
> and for whatever it's worth, I use these aliases:
> $ alias | grep sha
> alias sha1='/usr/bin/openssl dgst -sha1 '
> alias sha256='/usr/bin/openssl dgst -sha256 '
> alias sha512='/usr/bin/openssl dgst -sha512 '
>
> Regards,
> Lee
>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: General questions "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-07-08 20:10 +0200
  Re: General questions 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com> - 2024-07-08 21:20 +0200
    Re: General questions Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-07-08 23:30 +0200
      Re: General questions gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-07-09 00:10 +0200
        Re: General questions "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2024-07-09 01:10 +0200
          Re: General questions gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-07-09 01:20 +0200
            Re: General questions 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 00:10 +0200
              Re: General questions Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 01:10 +0200
                Re: General questions 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 13:50 +0200
                Re: General questions 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 14:00 +0200
                Re: General questions Franco Martelli <martellif67@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 21:30 +0200
                Re: General questions Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 22:00 +0200
                Re: General questions Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-07-11 14:00 +0200
                Re: General questions 타토카 <cybertatoka@gmail.com> - 2024-07-11 14:30 +0200
                Re: General questions "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-07-11 14:40 +0200
                Re: General questions Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-07-11 14:40 +0200
                Re: General questions Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2024-07-11 15:50 +0200

csiph-web