Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #270844

Re: This is a testmail!

From Jeff Pang <jeff@simplemail.co.in>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: This is a testmail!
Date 2024-07-05 00:30 +0200
Message-ID <IWD7H-7IrU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IWsFj-7BZJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <IWtrH-7Cwx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <IWtL3-7CD0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IWBIC-7HpY-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


I didn’t chech the header.
But loop.de should have its own signature.
Debian list server rewrite envelope address to list adress due to SRS 
requirements.
But message header address is not changed as well as message body 
(debian list seems not modifying message body), so DKIM for loop.de will 
be valid, then DMARC for loop.de will pass as well.


On 2024-07-05 04:54, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> Isn't this the usual DKIM problem with lists?
> The From: has @loop.de, but the sender and DKIM signature
> is from lists.debian.org.
> 
> That's why most lists these days rewrite the From: header.
> 
>   Detlef
> 
> On 7/4/24 14:24, Hans wrote:
>> Me again, sorry.
>> 
>> 
>> Now I got my last mail back with the spam tag!
>> 
>> 
>> Subject:
>> Re: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
>> 
>> 
>> This is the header:
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------
>> X-Spam-Flag: YES
>> X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
>> X-Envelope-From: 
>> bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop.de@lists.debian.org
>> DMARC-Filter:
>>   OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail39c50.megamailservers.eu 464C5Iek122979
>> Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
>>   dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loop.de
>> Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
>>   spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org
>> Authentication-Results: mail39c50.megamailservers.eu;
>>   dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key)
>>   header.d=megamailservers.eu header.i=@megamailservers.eu 
>> header.b="QLjumGn/"
>> Return-Path: 
>> <bounce-debian-user=hans.ullrich=loop.de@lists.debian.org>
>> Received:
>>   from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by
>>   mail39c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 
>> 464C5Iek122979 for
>>   <hans.ullrich@loop.de>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:05:21 +0000
>> Received:
>>   from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org 
>> (Postfix) with
>>   QMQP id EA3E420682; Thu,  4 Jul 2024 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
>> X-Mailbox-Line:
>>   From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org  Thu Jul  4 12:05:15 2024
>> Old-Return-Path: <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on 
>> bendel.debian.org
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=4.0 
>> tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
>>   FOURLA,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,LDOSUBSCRIBER,LDO_WHITELIST 
>> autolearn=unavailable
>>   autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
>> X-Original-To: lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org
>> Delivered-To: lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org
>> Received:
>>   from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bendel.debian.org 
>> (Postfix) with
>>   ESMTP id C18E42067A for <lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org>; Thu,
>>    4 Jul 2024 12:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
>> X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
>> X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No,
>>   score=-6.301 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2,
>>   DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FOURLA=0.1, 
>> KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399,
>>   LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
>> Received:
>>   from bendel.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org
>>   [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
>>   port 2525) with ESMTP id CNGEsE8xgvQ4 for
>>   <lists-debian-user@bendel.debian.org>; Thu,  4 Jul 2024 12:05:03 
>> +0000 (UTC)
>> X-policyd-weight:
>>    NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 HELO_IP_IN_CL_SUBNET=-1.2 (check from: 
>> .loop. -
>>   helo: .mail194c50.megamailservers. - helo-domain: .megamailservers.)
>>   FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -4.7
>> Received:
>>   from mail194c50.megamailservers.eu (mail208c50.megamailservers.eu
>>   [91.136.10.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher 
>> ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
>>   (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by 
>> bendel.debian.org
>>   (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC67D20677 for 
>> <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu,
>>    4 Jul 2024 12:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
>> X-Authenticated-User: 01793666059@o2online.de
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; 
>> d=megamailservers.eu;
>>   s=maildub; t=1720094700; 
>> bh=5Um9/MplAQNd+svZJOunmBGElnorPOi9odLzGqxgObQ=;
>>   h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
>>   b=QLjumGn/60xFVhN9BUbajEg0uTOZxqi/Uz8jodz7E1EE2Hi7W3VtjJFW4LGmbJGnC
>>   Lt7Nym0B3iEmO+1/fxpnDfmt1lRnzu+Q65akTEd8eaEHbj8G7yo5OCpI4oVjRr7q9o
>>   pn0upeaUIrxnepbAwXeozeebIuTSx2zuaH0xvL30=
>> Feedback-ID: hans.ullrich@lo
>> Received:
>>   from protheus2.localnet (a89-183-193-109.net-htp.de 
>> [89.183.193.109])
>>   (authenticated bits=0) by mail194c50.megamailservers.eu 
>> (8.14.9/8.13.1) with
>>   ESMTP id 464C4rxR025870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
>>   cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for
>>   <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:04:55 +0000
>> From: Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de>
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: *****SPAM***** [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail!
>> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:04:53 +0200
>> Message-ID: <2408526.NG923GbCHz@protheus2>
>> In-Reply-To: <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
>> References:
>>   <3645068.R56niFO833@protheus2> <66868718.1030800@fastmail.fm>
>>   <46505217.fMDQidcC6G@protheus2>
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>> X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
>> X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean
>> X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
>> X-VADE-SPAMSCORE: 0
>> X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
>>   
>> gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
>> ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjgh
>> fggfgtgejudeftdfjphegsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefjrghnshcuoehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthhesl
>> hhoohhprdguvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfdvudekheefueevieelgefftdfhtedvlefgfefhieevveejud
>> elhffhleethfeknecukfhppeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdekledrudekfedrudelfedruddtleenucevlhh
>> ushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeekvddrudelhedrjeehrddutddtpdhhvghlohepsg
>> gvnhguvghlrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsohhunhgtvgdquggvsghirghnqdhus
>> hgvrhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhpehlohhophdruggvsehlihhsthhsrdguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghdpnhg
>> spghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehhrghnshdruhhllhhrihgthheslhhoohhprdguvg
>> X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE:
>>   
>> gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudelgdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgem
>> ucfjqffuvffqrffktedpqfgfvfdpgffpggdqveehtdenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucenucfjughrpefhvf
>> fufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepjfgrnhhsuceohhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohho
>> phdruggvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefvdethfeludejieeljeeugefgieekheeitdfggfehuedvvdfhjedute
>> ekkedtvdenucfkphepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrgh
>> mpehinhgvthepkeelrddukeefrdduleefrddutdelpdhhvghlohepphhrohhthhgvuhhsvddrlhhotggrlhhnv
>> ghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhephhgrnhhsrdhulhhlrhhitghhsehlohhophdruggvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhope
>> dupdhrtghpthhtohepuggvsghirghnqdhushgvrheslhhishhtshdruggvsghirghnrdhorhhg
>> X-Rspamd-Status: No, score=1.59
>> X-Rspamd-Result: default: False [1.59 / 6.00];
>>   R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[megamailservers.eu:s=maildub]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[];

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

This is a testmail! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 13:20 +0200
  Re: This is a testmail! The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-04 13:30 +0200
    Re: This is a testmail! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 14:00 +0200
      [SOLVED] Re: This is a testmail! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 14:10 +0200
  Re: This is a testmail! CToID <funk443@yahoo.com.tw> - 2024-07-04 13:50 +0200
  Re: This is a testmail! Roger Price <roger@rogerprice.org> - 2024-07-04 14:10 +0200
    Re: This is a testmail! Roger Price <roger@rogerprice.org> - 2024-07-04 14:30 +0200
    Re: This is a testmail! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 14:30 +0200
      Re: This is a testmail! Thomas Hochstein <thh@thh.name> - 2024-07-04 19:20 +0200
        Re: This is a testmail! The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-04 21:00 +0200
          Re: This is a testmail! Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 21:30 +0200
            Re: This is a testmail! The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-04 21:40 +0200
              Testmail_3: Reply to one of the mails from The Wanderer Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 22:10 +0200
                Re: Testmail_3: Reply to one of the mails from The Wanderer The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-04 22:20 +0200
                Re: Testmail_3: Reply to one of the mails from The Wanderer The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-04 22:20 +0200
                Re: Testmail_3: Reply to one of the mails from The Wanderer Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-07-04 22:30 +0200
      Re: This is a testmail! Detlef Vollmann <dv@vollmann.ch> - 2024-07-04 23:00 +0200
        Re: This is a testmail! Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-07-04 23:20 +0200
        Re: This is a testmail! Jeff Pang <jeff@simplemail.co.in> - 2024-07-05 00:30 +0200

csiph-web