Re: testing, various tmpfs /run directories, df -x tmpfs

From	songbird <songbird@anthive.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: testing, various tmpfs /run directories, df -x tmpfs
Date	2024-06-20 15:50 +0200
Message-ID	<IRqkN-4hVT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<IQQU1-3UmJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <IQUNX-3WZK-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	the little wild kingdom

Show all headers | View raw

David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 18 Jun 2024 at 19:29:31 (-0400), songbird wrote:
>
>> "df -x tmpfs" does the magic and gives me the better view that is
>> more useful.
>
> FWIW I define dfree as:
>
>   df --output=source,ipcent,fstype,size,used,avail,pcent,target -B 1000000 -x tmpfs -x devtmpfs -x fuse.portal | sed -E 's/([^ ] )/\1 /g'

  :)


> which produces a listing like:
>
>   $ dfree
>   Filesystem      IUse%  Type  1MB-blocks    Used   Avail  Use%  Mounted  on
>   /dev/nvme0n1p2    23%  ext4       30783   17131   12063   59%  /
>   /dev/nvme0n1p3     3%  ext4       30783    1922   27272    7%  /apex-partial
>   /dev/nvme0n1p1      -  vfat         523      21     502    5%  /boot/efi
>   /dev/dm-0          2%  ext4      390073  186974  183209   51%  /home
>   $ 
>
> For filesystems, I find a uniform MB works better than "human-readable" sizes.

  i also find the same units better for my pea brain...  :)


  songbird

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

testing, various tmpfs /run directories, df -x tmpfs songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2024-06-19 02:00 +0200
  Re: testing, various tmpfs /run directories, df -x tmpfs David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-06-19 06:10 +0200
    Re: testing, various tmpfs /run directories, df -x tmpfs songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2024-06-20 15:50 +0200

csiph-web