Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1197743

Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm?

From John Waffle <jwaffe75@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm?
Date 2024-05-17 17:10 +0200
Message-ID <IF7nz-dZ15-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IF74d-dYFh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <IF7dT-dYIi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IF74d-dYFh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <IF7dT-dYIi-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Mark,

How do I get in contact with them, should I just send a message to
security@debian.org?

Thanks,
- J

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:54 AM Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:43:26AM -0400, John Waffle wrote:
>
> > - The zlib package page https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zlib says that
> > CVE-2023-45853 <
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-45853>
> > is ignored, what is the basis for ignoring this CVE?
> > - Is there a plan to backport zlib 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 to bookworm? It looks
> > like it's currently in trixie
>
> Please direct any questions about security updates to the security team.
>

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? John Waffle <jwaffe75@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 16:50 +0200
  Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 17:00 +0200
    Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? John Waffle <jwaffe75@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 17:10 +0200
      Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? Mark Brown <broonie@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 17:10 +0200
  Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 18:20 +0200
    Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? John Waffle <jwaffe75@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 22:10 +0200
      Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-05-18 11:10 +0200
        Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? John Waffle <jwaffe75@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 16:10 +0200
          Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? John Waffle <jwaffe75@gmail.com> - 2024-05-24 20:10 +0200
            Bug#1071276: Is 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 affected by CVE-2023-45853, and if it is, will 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1 be backported to bookworm? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2024-05-24 21:50 +0200

csiph-web