Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1197695

Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9

From Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9
Date 2024-05-17 09:40 +0200
Message-ID <IF0m5-dUwy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IETND-dQiy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gg7ER-gRHh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IETND-dQiy-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello,

I pushed a branch arnaudr/docker24/1. It still FTBFS of course, but the 
output looks a bit more sane. Hope that helps!

Arnaud

On 17/05/2024 07:28, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> copying everyone currently listed as co-maintainer of the docker.io 
> <http://docker.io> package in Debian.
>
> I've decided to give this thing a stab. It seems Debian currently 
> ships the same minor upstream version of docker.io <http://docker.io> 
> 20.10 as we had in unstable, and more and more packages (such as 
> podman) require significantly newer versions  of docker. This is 
> starting to do a serious disservice to our users.
>
> My current work in progress lives in 
> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/docker/-/tree/siretart/docker24?ref_type=heads. 
> So far, I've:
>
> - identified that libnetwork got merged into gh:moby/moby, so I've 
> removed references from the packaging
> - tried to follow README.source as much as possible
> - identified vendored sources and updated the Files-Excluded fields 
> and debian/copyright as appropriate
> - refreshed patches against the new upstream version
> - identified circular dependencies and chose vendored versions to 
> unbreak them.
>
> What I would appreciate help with:
>
> - reviewing what I've done. This is a very complex package that is 
> done in a style that I'm not used to work with
> - help getting it to build (it currently doesn't, I suspect because at 
> least some dependencies in debian are too old. I guess using vendored 
> copies is the most expedient way to go about this?
> - update debian/copyright for new code additions
> - identify and drop unnecessary dependencies from debian/control.
>
> Thank you so much for your support and assistance!
>
> -rt
>
>
> -- 
> regards,
>     Reinhard

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 02:40 +0200
  Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 05:50 +0200
    Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 09:40 +0200
      Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 21:10 +0200
        Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 00:30 +0200
          Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:30 +0200
            Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org> - 2024-05-20 16:10 +0200
        Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2024-05-23 20:50 +0200
  Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 09:40 +0200

csiph-web