Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1197695
| From | Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 |
| Date | 2024-05-17 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IF0m5-dUwy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IETND-dQiy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gg7ER-gRHh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IETND-dQiy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hello, I pushed a branch arnaudr/docker24/1. It still FTBFS of course, but the output looks a bit more sane. Hope that helps! Arnaud On 17/05/2024 07:28, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > copying everyone currently listed as co-maintainer of the docker.io > <http://docker.io> package in Debian. > > I've decided to give this thing a stab. It seems Debian currently > ships the same minor upstream version of docker.io <http://docker.io> > 20.10 as we had in unstable, and more and more packages (such as > podman) require significantly newer versions of docker. This is > starting to do a serious disservice to our users. > > My current work in progress lives in > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/docker/-/tree/siretart/docker24?ref_type=heads. > So far, I've: > > - identified that libnetwork got merged into gh:moby/moby, so I've > removed references from the packaging > - tried to follow README.source as much as possible > - identified vendored sources and updated the Files-Excluded fields > and debian/copyright as appropriate > - refreshed patches against the new upstream version > - identified circular dependencies and chose vendored versions to > unbreak them. > > What I would appreciate help with: > > - reviewing what I've done. This is a very complex package that is > done in a style that I'm not used to work with > - help getting it to build (it currently doesn't, I suspect because at > least some dependencies in debian are too old. I guess using vendored > copies is the most expedient way to go about this? > - update debian/copyright for new code additions > - identify and drop unnecessary dependencies from debian/control. > > Thank you so much for your support and assistance! > > -rt > > > -- > regards, > Reinhard
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> - 2024-05-17 02:40 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 05:50 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 09:40 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 21:10 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 00:30 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:30 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org> - 2024-05-20 16:10 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2024-05-23 20:50 +0200
Bug#1033839: Packaging docker 24.0.9 Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org> - 2024-05-17 09:40 +0200
csiph-web