Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #122055
| From | rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures |
| Date | 2024-01-13 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HVM5z-2OsB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HVsqd-2C7o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVtFD-2CMv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVu8F-2Dcd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVCSB-2Iqp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVM5z-2OsB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
> * Thank you for your offering, but Debian is never in lack of > x86/x86_64/amd64/intel/amd/whatever_you_name_it hardware for package building. > In fact, we now have some of the very powerful machines. If you're sure. Working 32-bit systems are not as common as they once were, and sometimes cross-compliling isn't quite the same (though that's usually a matter of optimization rather than function). I'll leave the offer open in case the need arises. My system is an Intel Atom N270. I keep it around for some simple services but you're welcome to use it if it helps. --J
Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 12:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 18:40 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 19:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-01-11 17:10 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 17:20 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 19:30 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:20 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 17:00 +0100
Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 20:20 +0100
Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-13 21:10 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:30 +0100
Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
csiph-web