Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #122055

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

From rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel, linux.debian.devel
Subject Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures
Date 2024-01-13 14:30 +0100
Message-ID <HVM5z-2OsB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <HVsqd-2C7o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVtFD-2CMv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVu8F-2Dcd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVCSB-2Iqp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HVM5z-2OsB-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


> * Thank you for your offering, but Debian is never in lack of
> x86/x86_64/amd64/intel/amd/whatever_you_name_it hardware for package building.
> In fact, we now have some of the very powerful machines.

If you're sure.  Working 32-bit systems are not as common as they once were, and sometimes cross-compliling isn't quite the same (though that's usually a matter of optimization rather than function).

I'll leave the offer open in case the need arises.  My system is an Intel Atom N270.  I keep it around for some simple services but you're welcome to use it if it helps.

--J

Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
  Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-11 10:50 +0100
    Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 12:50 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 18:40 +0100
          Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 19:50 +0100
      Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-01-11 17:10 +0100
        Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 17:20 +0100
          Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Alan Corey <alan01346@gmail.com> - 2024-01-12 19:30 +0100
            Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
              Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2024-01-13 04:50 +0100
                Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:20 +0100
                Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> - 2024-01-13 17:00 +0100
                Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 20:20 +0100
                Re: Offer to make a native 32-bit system avaiable Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com> - 2024-01-13 21:10 +0100
              Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys <rhys@neoquasar.org> - 2024-01-13 14:30 +0100
  Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2024-01-11 11:50 +0100

csiph-web