Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel.release > #121515
| From | Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable |
| Date | 2023-12-14 13:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HKSR3-dwEC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HIy0p-c3Z0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HKEO5-dnzb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HKII1-dpOW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HKL3b-dr9l-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:49:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: >... > Currently there is no real security support for Qt WebEngine in stable, which > is an oversight that might surprise many Debian users. The purpose of this > discussion is to figure out the best way to change that. This is not a new discussion, and there aren't any simple solutions. The release notes for squeeze[1] released nearly 13 years ago already had a section on limited support for browser engines. For web browsers, shipping the latest versions is the only workable solution. WebKitGTK is basically the GNOME equivalent of Qt WebEngine based on a different browser. Security support for WebKitGTK was also missing for many years, it became feasible when upstream made commitments regarding API/ABI compatibility and sticking to using older versions of dependencies. Qt has nearly 30 years history of being somewhere between open source and freemium,[2] this is not an upstream one would expect to make such commitments. > Shipping LTS versions > of Qt in stable would put us in a better position than the status quo, even if > it doesn’t get us all the way there. >... When a suitable version is available updating in (old)stable might be possible, e.g. updating qtwebengine-opensource-src in stable and oldstable might be technically feasible and rebuilding angelfish would be unlikely to be a dealbreaker if someone wants to discuss such a (tested!) update with the release team. The release team might or might not agree with such an update, but this would not be the same as providing security support for qtwebengine-opensource-src. Your "better position" might actually be worse, far more surprising than flagging something as unsupported from the beginning would be declaring it supported and then dropping support after a year - what are users supposed to do at that point? cu Adrian [1] https://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/amd64/release-notes.en.txt [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(software)#History_of_Qt
Back to linux.debian.devel.release | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-13 22:20 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-12-14 02:40 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-14 05:00 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-12-14 08:40 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-14 08:50 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-12-14 09:10 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-14 21:00 +0100
Re: Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-12-14 13:40 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com> - 2023-12-15 02:30 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-16 21:30 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-12-17 00:20 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-17 00:40 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Patrick Franz <deltaone@debian.org> - 2023-12-17 01:00 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-17 01:30 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-17 02:10 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2023-12-17 11:20 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-18 18:40 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2023-12-20 15:10 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-20 20:30 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2023-12-20 21:30 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-20 22:10 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2023-12-21 11:10 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-21 21:00 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2023-12-21 22:00 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2023-12-22 23:00 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2024-01-09 02:50 +0100
Bug#1057755: Qt WebEngine Security Support In Stable Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2023-12-20 14:40 +0100
csiph-web