Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #264590
| From | Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) |
| Date | 2023-12-11 09:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HJJPP-cNny-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HJrpT-cC7E-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HJsch-cCCh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HJFjb-cKvV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11 Dec 2023 04:31 +0100, from rewefie@gmx.com (Stella Ashburne): > Someone on a social media platform stated that there are only two > "canonical" [sic] ways to verify the version of Debian installed on > a system. They are: > > uname -a > > /proc/version > > Do you agree with the above statement? No. Running `uname -a` or looking at the contents of `/proc/version` will only tell you about the _currently running_ _kernel_. There is no guarantee that a given kernel version maps exactly to any given Debian release or point-in-time state. If you want to specify the installation state of a Debian system, you should specify the point release you're on (from /etc/debian_version on any modern Debian) and the full _package_ version of any relevant packages (as reported by e.g. dpkg -l). Note that the package version may be different from the version reported by a program itself. A lot of the time, something like "current up-to-date Bookworm" or "Bookworm per <UTC timestamp>" is sufficiently precise, as long as you have confirmed that this is actually the case. >>> sudo dpkg -i linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 >>> [...] >>> Is the above the correct way to install kernels that are not in the official repos? >> >> Not quite, because dpkg -i wants a file path, not a package name >> (that's for apt/apt-get). > > 2. sudo dpkg -i openvpn_2.6.8-bookworm0_amd64.deb linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 is a package name. (You can check this with apt-cache show.) openvpn_2.6.8-bookworm0_amd64.deb is presumably a file name. "File path" does not necessarily require specifying a directory component of the path; a bare file name is also a (relative) path. -- Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-10 13:50 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-10 14:40 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 04:40 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-11 04:50 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 11:30 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-11 08:30 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 11:40 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2023-12-11 09:30 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-10 14:50 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-10 16:10 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-10 19:10 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 03:30 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 03:40 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-11 04:30 +0100
Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1) Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 04:50 +0100
Release process notes [WAS Re: Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-12-11 08:20 +0100
Re: Release process notes [WAS Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)] Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 14:40 +0100
Re: Release process notes [WAS Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-11 15:20 +0100
Re: Release process notes [WAS Need clarifications about how to deal with the installed problematic kernel, linux-image-6.1.0-14-amd64 (6.1.64-1)] Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2023-12-11 16:00 +0100
csiph-web