Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #264091
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... |
| Date | 2023-12-02 07:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HGrmp-avJL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HGnC9-atkW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HGnVv-atr0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HGoox-atAT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HGoox-atAT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 02:52:25AM +0000, Albretch Mueller wrote: > direct dependencies of packages which haven't been downloaded, > install. I need to download those packages. > These should be a straightforward way to do that or an easy hack. > lbrtchx I /think/ this hack might involve iterations until you hit a fixed point. See -- package dependencies are listed in the package itself, so you know your original package's direct dependencies. Off you go, download those, look into those packages, find the dependencies... and off you go, download the dependencies's dependencies. Until you reach the fixed point. There's one package, apt-cache, which can look at a pre-made complete dependencies's network. But to update that database you have to be online... Sounds like quite the fun. Cheers -- t
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2023-12-02 03:10 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> - 2023-12-02 03:30 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-02 04:00 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-12-02 05:10 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-02 05:30 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2023-12-02 07:20 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-02 15:20 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-12-03 05:30 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-12-03 05:50 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2023-12-07 00:10 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-12-07 07:00 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2023-12-02 04:00 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-12-02 07:10 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-12-03 05:30 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com> - 2023-12-02 04:00 +0100
Re: packages listed vs. apt-rdepends --follow=Depends ... Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> - 2023-12-02 04:10 +0100
csiph-web