Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1165358

Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian

From Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian
Date 2023-08-24 14:10 +0200
Message-ID <H6hjX-44JU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <H41jj-2Fcq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <H45wB-2I8w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <H65Vv-3XqF-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <H41jj-2Fcq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <H65Vv-3XqF-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 01:46:11AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 08:07:44 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > FWIW, I have been maintaining vagrant in Debian for several years.
> 
> BTW, thank you for having done that, it's been much appreciated!
> 
> > TL;DR: I will not be maintaining vagrant anymore.
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 02:56:28PM +0900, Kentaro HAYASHI wrote:
> > > * What was the outcome of this action?
> 
> > > Plan A.
> […]
> 
> > > Plan B.
> […]
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 09:37:54AM +0000, Gwili.Stifter@EasyMailer.live wrote:
> > > Plan C.
> […]
> 
> There's perhaps a:
> 
> Plan D.
> 
> - Package Vagrunt (https://github.com/vaagrunt/vagrunt) a fork of
>   Vagrant, that is stated should remain free software. And as it does
>   not have a CLA, if it gets several contributions it will be
>   increasingly hard to relicense.
> - Transition from vagrant to vagrunt via a transitional package.
> 
> (We use Vagrant at work, and I'm not planning on relying on a non-free
> tool, so a fork would do, otherwise I'd have to look into alternatives
> for us to switch to.)

I have seen this a couple of days ago.

So far vagrunt is vaporware. The GitHub user which created has -- as far
as I looked, i.e. on GitHub itself -- 0 contributions to Ruby projects.
I'm also not confident that it will be easy to keep up with e.g. new
VirtualBox versions without effectively infringing on HashiCorp
copyrights.

I will love to be proven wrong, but I'm not holding my breath here.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Kentaro HAYASHI <kenhys@xdump.org> - 2023-08-18 08:40 +0200
  Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Gwili.Stifter@EasyMailer.live - 2023-08-18 11:40 +0200
    Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2023-08-18 13:10 +0200
      Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2023-08-19 07:00 +0200
        Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2023-08-22 17:10 +0200
      Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-08-24 02:00 +0200
        Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2023-08-24 14:10 +0200
  Bug#1049999: vagrant: the future of packaging vagrant in Debian Gwili.Stifter@EasyMailer.live - 2023-08-18 15:40 +0200

csiph-web