Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.project > #13351

Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod

From Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.project, linux.debian.devel
Subject Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod
Date 2023-08-21 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <H5fDA-3qtg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <H4ik9-2PKC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <H4xMd-2ZAA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <H4yRX-30cI-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization The Debian Project, http://www.debian.org/

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:28:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 07:11:11PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> > >The mission you have chosen for yourself, then, is to identify all those
> > >things in the Debian distribution that are not constitutive of an
> > >operating system.
> > 
> > That is a major part of the work of a Debian Developer, and the ftp-master team.
> > 
> But we have established criteria,

We have not.

https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct.en starts off with:

"The Debian Project, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted a
 code of conduct for participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels and
 other modes of communication within the project."

Packaged software is not a "mode of communication within the project".
The code of conduct, therefore, does not apply to it.

We may decide that certain language is inappropriate in our packages,
and if so, you can start censoring packages in the archive under the
code of conduct. I make no statement as to whether I believe that is the
right course of action at this point; bring it to a GR and you will see.

Absent that action, however, the code of conduct does not apply to
relevant content of packages in the archive.

-- 
     w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}

I will have a Tin-Actinium-Potassium mixture, thanks.

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 03:40 +0200
  Debian is not X (was Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod) Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2023-08-19 18:10 +0200
  Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2023-08-19 19:20 +0200
    Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod "Paul R. Tagliamonte" <paultag@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 20:40 +0200
      Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2023-08-19 23:00 +0200
    Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2023-08-19 23:00 +0200
      Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2023-08-21 18:20 +0200
        Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2023-08-21 20:00 +0200

csiph-web