Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found"

From	Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found"
Date	2023-08-10 21:50 +0200
Message-ID	<H1jPr-T0c-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<H1jPr-T0c-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Default User (12023-08-10):
> And, if /lost+found should be excluded, then shouldn't "lost+found" in
> any other directories be excluded from backups as well? Why/why not? 

Before anybody answers all your question, there is something that needs
checking:

Do you know what lost+found is for?

If not, please read some documentation about it. The explanation of its
function contains the answer to the question I left quoted above.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2023-08-10 21:50 +0200
  Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:50 +0200
    Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2023-08-11 00:10 +0200
      Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-11 00:30 +0200
      Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Bob McGowan <tumcsv@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 01:10 +0200
        Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-08-11 01:40 +0200
    Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Default User <hunguponcontent@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 03:20 +0200
      Re: Why or why not back up "/lost+found" Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-11 04:20 +0200

csiph-web