Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #107991
| From | Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal |
| Date | 2023-05-23 03:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Gyp0B-aMuM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GwgNP-9s1z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GwAte-9E8J-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GxsWB-acZj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 12:28:41PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > I was aware of it (the gentoo info is linked on the 64bit-time wiki > page), but had not yet looked into how significant an issue this actually > was, so had not documented it. (frankly, I was hoping we could avoid > tying yet another transition into this one). Thanks for the reminder. > So having re-read that, if I understand this correctly, we do need to > be mindful that software which looks up functions or function > parameters in unusual ways (e.g. cross-language Foreign Function > Interfaces, or using implicit declarations) is likely to get the > wrong-size definition (because glibc makes both versions available). > So we should enable -Wimplicit-function-declaration on libraries being > rebuilt because their ABIs changed. I guess this needs to be -Werror=implicit-function-declaration, to ensure it fails the build if used, regardless of whether -Werror is set elsewhere? > We don't need to enable/fix it for everything though. A rebuild check of > affected libraries to see how much work this adds would be a good idea. Isn't it a problem not just for library ABIs but also for any other packages rebuild with -D_TIME_BITS=64, because the code will be consuming the 64-bit prototype from the headers but using the 32-bit symbol at runtime? (Which is a better answer in terms of automation, because then we can just put it in dpkg-buildflags) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 06:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-17 07:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 22:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Florian Lohoff <f@zz.de> - 2023-05-22 10:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 07:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-05-18 12:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 16:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-18 18:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Olaf Titz <olaf@bigred.inka.de> - 2023-06-26 20:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 16:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2023-05-18 21:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 21:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-05-17 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 07:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 14:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 17:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 03:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 21:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 05:40 +0200
i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 13:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 14:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 16:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 16:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 16:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 17:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2023-05-25 13:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 17:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 18:00 +0200
partial support for i386 (Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)) Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 19:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2023-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 17:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 18:00 +0200
Bug#1036358: release-notes: Debian 12 expected to be last release w/ installer for i386 Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-19 17:40 +0200
Re: Bug#1036358: release-notes: Debian 12 expected to be last release w/ installer for i386 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 19:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 19:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 20:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> - 2023-05-19 21:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-19 22:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> - 2023-05-19 22:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2023-05-20 07:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-20 14:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-05-31 01:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 06:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2023-05-31 14:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Sven Hoexter <sven@stormbind.net> - 2023-05-31 16:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 18:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-31 20:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-31 21:30 +0200
Re: Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 07:00 +0200
Re: Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-31 10:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 12:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Sven Hoexter <sven@stormbind.net> - 2023-05-31 16:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 18:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-05-31 23:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-06-01 00:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2023-06-01 15:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-06-02 19:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2023-06-02 21:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-06-02 23:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-01 03:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> - 2023-06-01 14:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com> - 2023-06-08 02:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 17:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 20:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-19 20:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-20 00:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-21 08:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> - 2023-05-26 01:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-26 06:50 +0200
Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2023-05-20 09:20 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> - 2023-05-20 11:30 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2023-05-20 18:50 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org> - 2023-05-21 20:00 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-22 14:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-20 05:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-20 10:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-23 03:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 04:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-06-14 06:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-06-17 17:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 08:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-20 02:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-20 13:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2023-05-20 17:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-23 03:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-23 03:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-06-06 09:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 12:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 13:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-06-06 17:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 20:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 21:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Alexis Murzeau <amubtdx@gmail.com> - 2023-06-06 21:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 21:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2023-06-08 07:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 21:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 07:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> - 2023-06-08 08:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Hakan Bayındır <hakan@bayindir.org> - 2023-06-08 10:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2023-06-08 11:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 06:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2023-06-09 11:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-06-09 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 17:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 01:30 +0200
Re: multiarch vs. multilib Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 11:00 +0200
Re: multiarch vs. multilib nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 10:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 05:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 11:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 06:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 08:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-07-05 18:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 21:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-06-08 19:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2023-06-08 20:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 21:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 19:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2023-06-26 21:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-06-27 10:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 18:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 23:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-07-07 01:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 22:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> - 2023-06-07 09:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal "Peter Van Eynde" <pvaneynd@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 10:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 12:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2023-06-07 13:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 19:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 19:20 +0200
[i386] adlibtracker2 and fp-units-i386 Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2023-06-07 15:40 +0200
Constructive contributions (was: Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 13:30 +0200
csiph-web