Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #256349
| From | Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Question for this IP's PTR |
| Date | 2023-03-25 02:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Gd0Tf-eSI2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GcZXb-eSak-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Gd06R-eSdj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 25/3/23 08:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: > I didn't know .one was a valid TLD. It looks like .two is not, so if > someone were to assign "two.two.two.two" as the PTR value of an IP > address, that PTR would not resolve back to any IP address. (An IP > address block owner might reject such a petition.) There is news of a recent TLD '888' but it's not yet known to whois -- Jeremy (Lists)
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question for this IP's PTR fh@dnsbed.com - 2023-03-25 01:30 +0100
Re: Question for this IP's PTR Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-03-25 01:40 +0100
Re: Question for this IP's PTR fh@dnsbed.com - 2023-03-25 02:30 +0100
Re: Question for this IP's PTR Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2023-03-25 02:30 +0100
Re: Question for this IP's PTR Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-03-25 10:30 +0100
Re: Question for this IP's PTR debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2023-03-25 19:20 +0100
csiph-web