Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #256139
| From | Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective |
| Date | 2023-03-17 17:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <GakOt-d8MU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <Gajpn-d7JR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GakbL-d8j5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Thanks for checking this for me, apparently I've got hardware problems. Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) . On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > https://slackware.uk/slint/x86_64/slint-15.0/iso/slint64-15.0-2.iso.sha256 > > https://slackware.uk/slint/x86_64/slint-15.0/iso/slint64-15.0-2.iso > > Let's see what an older Debian perceives (... downloading 3.7 GiB lasts a > while ...): > > $ sha256sum -c slint64-15.0-2.iso.sha256 > slint64-15.0-2.iso: OK > > Various checksums: > > $ sha256sum slint64-15.0-2.iso > cc0421fdd9630d3bb3ea8ef338c7cfb7a29fd8df98ccbae3debed60847a976a3 slint64-15.0-2.iso > $ sha512sum slint64-15.0-2.iso > faf3210c680caeb5875651989aeb2841b4a0733a618b8d13e5163ebf5c16046d82d4ee645d471664604eeb164e0bd7b919f64e4798167f48a6ed2e935d06d6a4 slint64-15.0-2.iso > $ md5sum slint64-15.0-2.iso > f00a3d3bf641309feac4b1aa9abacf4f slint64-15.0-2.iso > $ crc32 slint64-15.0-2.iso > 3ed8c08a > $ > > I don't think that somebody fiddled with pickles like md5sum or crc32. > So only if sha256sum says mismatch and md5sum says match, then i would > suspect that sha256sum is broken. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 14:40 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> - 2023-03-17 15:00 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-03-17 15:00 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 15:40 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-03-17 16:30 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 17:10 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2023-04-24 13:40 +0200
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-03-17 15:10 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 15:30 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective davidson <davidson@freevolt.org> - 2023-03-17 15:50 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 16:10 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-03-17 17:10 +0100
Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective davidson <davidson@freevolt.org> - 2023-03-17 16:10 +0100
csiph-web