Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #256132

Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective

From davidson <davidson@freevolt.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective
Date 2023-03-17 15:50 +0100
Message-ID <Gajz3-d7NH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <Gaitj-d78u-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I have had multiple verification failures checking an iso with a sha256sum
> verification file and am wondering if that program and the rest of the
> shaxxxsum programs have one or more bugs that could account for these
> failures.

Let the sha256sum program be a box of test strips that indicate
presence of poison.

Let the files you provide the sha256sum program be a beverage.

If a single test indicated poison, my first thought would not be,
"Maybe the test strips are defective".

And if *repeated* tests indicated poison, and did so consistently, my
first thought would not *definitely* not be, "Maybe the test strips
are defective".

It is admittedly an imperfectly simplified analogy, but I think my
point ought to be clear enough.

-- 
Ce qui est important est rarement urgent
et ce qui est urgent est rarement important
-- Dwight David Eisenhower

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 14:40 +0100
  Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> - 2023-03-17 15:00 +0100
  Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-03-17 15:00 +0100
    Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 15:40 +0100
      Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2023-03-17 16:30 +0100
        Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 17:10 +0100
        Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2023-04-24 13:40 +0200
  Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-03-17 15:10 +0100
    Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 15:30 +0100
  Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective davidson <davidson@freevolt.org> - 2023-03-17 15:50 +0100
    Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2023-03-17 16:10 +0100
      Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-03-17 17:10 +0100
    Re: bookworm sha256sum may be defective davidson <davidson@freevolt.org> - 2023-03-17 16:10 +0100

csiph-web