Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #260624
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: chrome web browser worthless |
| Date | 2023-08-03 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GYyhX-4LCy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <GYpeF-4EzF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYpy1-4EXO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYqkp-4FwM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYrgt-4G9L-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYu4F-4I2C-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:05:11PM -0400, gene heskett wrote: [...] > show mea link to the doc that explains that please > Cheers, Gene Heskett. There's not "the doc", but many of them. For starters, rfc5735 [1] tells us that the whole subnet 127.0.0.0/8 is available for loopback purposes (I've used it to test web servers locally, picking one address and giving them a suitable name in /etc/hosts) The 127.0.1.1 seems to be a Debianism explained here [2]. It seems that some (ahem) software (Typical GNOME) wants to know "no, what's my "real" IP address) and fails if there ain't one, so this seems to have been done to pacify those. Bad software, bad. And now go fire your search engine ;-) Cheers [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5735#section-4 [2] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution -- t
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-01 11:40 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-01 12:30 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-01 15:00 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-01 18:40 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org> - 2023-08-01 12:30 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-01 14:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-08-01 14:40 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-01 13:30 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless "Roy J. Tellason, Sr." <roy@rtellason.com> - 2023-08-01 22:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2023-08-02 10:00 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-02 13:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-08-02 15:50 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-02 20:10 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2023-08-02 21:10 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-08-02 21:50 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-02 19:10 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-02 19:30 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-02 20:50 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-08-03 07:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-08-02 20:30 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-02 21:00 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-08-02 21:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-02 21:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-02 22:20 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-08-02 22:50 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2023-08-02 21:40 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-02 22:10 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-08-02 23:10 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-03 02:10 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-08-03 06:40 +0200
Re: chrome web browser worthless gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-03 03:10 +0200
127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-08-03 01:30 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-03 01:40 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 01:50 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-08-03 06:30 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2023-08-03 04:10 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-08-03 04:10 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2023-08-04 01:00 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-08-05 04:30 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2023-08-05 10:20 +0200
Re: 127.0.1.1 line, was Re: chrome web browser worthless David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2023-08-03 04:10 +0200
csiph-web