Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #260627
| From | Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: AMD GPU hard lockups |
| Date | 2023-08-03 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GYHEB-4RSC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <GYrq9-4Gec-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYrJv-4GlW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYrJv-4GlW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYtrX-4Hxx-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GYu4F-4I2C-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 02:08:27 +0200 zithro <slack@rabbit.lu> wrote: > On 03 Aug 2023 01:25, Celejar wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand your point: if we assume that the fact that > > my adapter burned indicates that my particular adapter must have been of > > very poor quality, than this implies that such adapters in general are > > not dangerous (which, as I've noted, is supported by the fact that > > reputable companies sell them, with no warnings that they're dangerous). > > You will never find in a car owner's manual that driving on pedestrians > may be dangerous ;) But you certainly will find warnings regarding safe vs. unsafe use of the product. > Joke aside those companies just wanna sell products. > Do the products fit you ? Read my previous email: YOU must check. > > To remove the confusion : your graphic card is rated at 150W, but it's > the MAX power it can use, not the power it uses all the time. > So, until you don't stress the GPU, those adapters will be perfectly fine. > Example from a Win domU, GPU-Z reports ~40W in idle (browsing, videos, > ...) for a Polaris20 GPU (AMD RX580), with a TDP of 185W. > That's why you only had problems when REALLY using the GPU. > > For instance, let's say you built a server, but only have a RX6600 as > video card, a 6 pins connector and a 6-to-8 adapter. > THIS will be perfectly fine : your GPU will never exceed limits, as it > will at most display a framebuffer. > > (To go even further : AFAIK, most graphic cards won't boot without the > external PCI-E power connector plugged, but if there wasn't such > "protection", as the x16 PCIe slot provides 75W, in my example above it > would be perfectly fine to use the card w/o the external plug). Thanks for the explanation. -- Celejar
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 17:50 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2023-08-01 18:00 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-08-01 18:40 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 19:20 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 19:20 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2023-08-01 19:30 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-01 20:10 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2023-08-01 20:20 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-02 03:30 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups zithro <slack@rabbit.lu> - 2023-08-02 23:20 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-02 23:40 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2023-08-02 23:40 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 01:30 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups zithro <slack@rabbit.lu> - 2023-08-03 02:10 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 16:40 +0200
Follow the specs :) (was Re: AMD GPU hard lockups) zithro <slack@rabbit.lu> - 2023-08-03 01:40 +0200
Re: Follow the specs :) (was Re: AMD GPU hard lockups) Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 03:00 +0200
Re: Follow the specs :) (was Re: AMD GPU hard lockups) gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2023-08-03 03:30 +0200
Re: AMD GPU hard lockups Cindy Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2023-08-03 05:00 +0200
csiph-web