Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15069

Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)"

From c.buhtz@posteo.jp
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)"
Date 2023-07-28 13:10 +0200
Message-ID <GWtw5-3m7F-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <GFLpo-fmvy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GUBo5-29xU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GUC0O-29Pn-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GWfjr-3d1M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GWsql-3lfx-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Dear Carsten,

thanks for taking time and replying.

Am 28.07.2023 11:53 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:
> you really should read the Social Contract/DFSG, the Debian policy and
> the Developers reference a few times.

I'll do.

> There is no rule that any DD or DM *must* do something in Debian, so
> you probably have the wrong expectations.

Fascinating.

> I don't see any workaround and there is non needed. The bug issue is
> about the not usable upstream test suite that would need to be called
> through d/rules.

Maybe this is again about my expectations and wrong assumptions.

So it is possible to have packages in the debian repo that don't run any 
tests? I wasn't expecting this.
So Back In Time is in Debian for many years and never run tests on the 
Debian build system? I'm shocked.

I didn't realize this. I thought that the test suite is broken and not 
it never works. ;)

Having a package in the official Debian repo was always kind of a 
quality certificate for me. ;)

> Sorry, but this is not your package! You are upstream, that's fine,
> but you want something to happen outside "your" world there you have
> no control of. We are here in Debian.

Understood.

> I don't see the Debian Maintainer is wanting something from you as
> Upstream, so again, your expectation is wrong to me.
> There is a open report that the upstream test can't be running while
> build, if you can provide useful tips to solve this fine

What else can be done than making upstream fix the buggy tests. ;)

> Ubuntu

:D No way!

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-06-12 10:00 +0200
  Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2023-06-12 10:50 +0200
    Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team  (DPT)" <c.buhtz@posteo.jp> - 2023-07-23 09:10 +0200
      Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2023-07-23 09:50 +0200
        Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team  (DPT)" <c.buhtz@posteo.jp> - 2023-07-27 22:00 +0200
          Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-07-28 09:20 +0200
          Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2023-07-28 12:00 +0200
            Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-07-28 13:10 +0200
              Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-28 14:40 +0200
              Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-07-28 15:40 +0200
            Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-28 14:50 +0200
              Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-07-28 15:00 +0200
            Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2023-07-28 21:40 +0200

csiph-web