Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15069
| From | c.buhtz@posteo.jp |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" |
| Date | 2023-07-28 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GWtw5-3m7F-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <GFLpo-fmvy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GUBo5-29xU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GUC0O-29Pn-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GWfjr-3d1M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GWsql-3lfx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Dear Carsten, thanks for taking time and replying. Am 28.07.2023 11:53 schrieb Carsten Schoenert: > you really should read the Social Contract/DFSG, the Debian policy and > the Developers reference a few times. I'll do. > There is no rule that any DD or DM *must* do something in Debian, so > you probably have the wrong expectations. Fascinating. > I don't see any workaround and there is non needed. The bug issue is > about the not usable upstream test suite that would need to be called > through d/rules. Maybe this is again about my expectations and wrong assumptions. So it is possible to have packages in the debian repo that don't run any tests? I wasn't expecting this. So Back In Time is in Debian for many years and never run tests on the Debian build system? I'm shocked. I didn't realize this. I thought that the test suite is broken and not it never works. ;) Having a package in the official Debian repo was always kind of a quality certificate for me. ;) > Sorry, but this is not your package! You are upstream, that's fine, > but you want something to happen outside "your" world there you have > no control of. We are here in Debian. Understood. > I don't see the Debian Maintainer is wanting something from you as > Upstream, so again, your expectation is wrong to me. > There is a open report that the upstream test can't be running while > build, if you can provide useful tips to solve this fine What else can be done than making upstream fix the buggy tests. ;) > Ubuntu :D No way!
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-06-12 10:00 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2023-06-12 10:50 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" <c.buhtz@posteo.jp> - 2023-07-23 09:10 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2023-07-23 09:50 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" <c.buhtz@posteo.jp> - 2023-07-27 22:00 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-07-28 09:20 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2023-07-28 12:00 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-07-28 13:10 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-28 14:40 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-07-28 15:40 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-28 14:50 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2023-07-28 15:00 +0200
Re: [backintime] Switch the maintainer to "Debian Python Team (DPT)" Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2023-07-28 21:40 +0200
csiph-web