Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #108692
| From | Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure |
| Date | 2023-07-21 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GTVoS-1ICx-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GTG6t-1z5m-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <GTTGp-1HxK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GTV5w-1IgO-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <GTVoR-1ICx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Jul 21, Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> wrote: > Ok found it call mountlo outdated > will need a small patch for linux uml, but may be worthwhile > Last version seems to be outdated 0.6 and carried by slitaz distribution. > May be time to revive it It looks like a good long term solution, but as long as there are insecure file systems in the kernel they should be disabled by default so these are really different issues. I remember noise from the systemd people about mounting removable media using user space drivers, but I do not think that anybody is working on this. -- ciao, Marco
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1041552: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-07-20 20:10 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2023-07-21 10:30 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-07-21 11:00 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Magissia <debianlist@magissia.com> - 2023-07-21 11:10 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de> - 2023-07-21 12:10 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 13:00 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 13:10 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2023-07-21 19:40 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2023-07-23 02:40 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Magissia <debianlist@magissia.com> - 2023-07-21 11:20 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 12:00 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-07-21 12:20 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 12:30 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 13:10 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-07-22 09:50 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2023-07-22 10:00 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2023-07-22 10:30 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> - 2023-07-22 10:40 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2023-07-22 14:50 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-07-25 06:40 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-07-25 06:30 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org> - 2023-07-21 12:20 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Bastien Roucariès <bastien.roucaries@cyu.fr> - 2023-07-21 12:30 +0200
Re: HFS/HFS+ are insecure Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com> - 2023-07-21 23:20 +0200
csiph-web