Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1154525

Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev

From Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release
Subject Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev
Date 2023-07-16 19:00 +0200
Message-ID <GSdgd-FI2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <GQs01-1X1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <GLYWC-1Kep-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GQsjn-244-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GLYWC-1Kep-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GQsjn-244-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Simon

On 2023-07-11 21:36:39 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 22:08:55 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2023-06-29 13:26:03 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > As previously mentioned on -devel, I would like src:sdl12-compat to
> > > take over the libsdl1.2-dev and libsdl1.2debian binary package names
> > > from src:libsdl1.2 during the trixie cycle. This mirrors a transition
> > > that already took place in several other distributions such as Fedora
> > > and Arch.
> > 
> > Please go ahead and raise the remaining regression bugs to serious.
> 
> Thanks, I'll upload the equivalent of sdl12-compat/experimental to
> unstable soon.
> 
> In the end none of the build regressions needed raising to RC:
> 
> - #1039479, #1039575, #1039581 have been fixed
> - #1012232, #1039439, #1039574 have workarounds in upstream
>   sdl12-compat, which I backported into Debian already
> 
> The two runtime regressions #1038738, #1038741 are currently tracked as
> bugs in both sdl12-compat and the relevant game (it's not clear which
> side a fix should come from), and I don't think they're bad enough to
> qualify as RC (the game can still be played, and in particular using
> native X11 instead of Xwayland is a workaround).

The autopkgtests of libsdl-perl regressed on the 32-bit architectures.
Could you check whether that is an issue in sdl12-compat or
libsdl-perl?

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-29 14:30 +0200
  Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2023-07-11 22:20 +0200
    Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-11 22:40 +0200
      Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2023-07-16 19:00 +0200
        Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-16 19:30 +0200
          Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-20 14:10 +0200
            Bug#1039911: transition: sdl12-compat taking over libsdl1.2-dev Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2023-07-20 20:00 +0200

csiph-web