Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1153980
| From | "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 |
| Date | 2023-07-13 05:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GQUIF-lUg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: sra-sdk@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:sra-sdk [ Reason ] Per #1039621, the new libngs-jni package accidentally wound up with bad content (unexpanded variables in the key symlink's source *and* target) that rendered it useless. [ Impact ] This package's reverse dependencies, from libngs-java on up, will be broken unless libncbi-ngs-dev happens to be installed. [ Tests ] Various affected packages have autopkgtests, but they evidently missed the relevant bug, having presumably wound up running with libncbi-ngs-dev additionally installed. (The tests did catch the need for architecture restrictions that made it into bookworm, FWIW.) [ Risks ] Minimal -- trivial fix, working in testing and unstable with no further changes from stable. [ Checklist ] [*] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog [v] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [v] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable [v] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable [ Changes ] Tweak debian/rules to make the necessary substitutions in libngs-java.links.in. [ Other info ] In reviewing the debdiff, I see that one of my teammates pushed a debian/salsa-ci.yml update without a corresponding changelog note that consequently slipped into -6 undocumented; what should I do about it at this point? I've held off on cleaning up a long-dangling symlink in a different binary package (sra-toolkit, #1040391) but can readily throw that in if you'd like.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org> - 2023-07-13 05:00 +0200
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2023-07-13 20:00 +0200
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) - 2023-07-13 20:20 +0200
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) - 2023-07-14 05:30 +0200
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2023-07-14 18:00 +0200
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko) - 2023-07-14 21:20 +0200
Bug#1040953: bookworm-pu: package sra-sdk/3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2023-07-14 21:30 +0200
Bug#1040953: sra-sdk 3.0.3+dfsg-6~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance Adam D Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> - 2023-07-15 14:40 +0200
csiph-web