Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #108134
| From | Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal |
| Date | 2023-06-08 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GEtkS-eze4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <GwgNP-9s1z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GDzsl-e0D6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GDCqd-e2j4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GDT7I-ecWP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 at 12:25:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 11:45 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > When considering the future of i386, a factor that we need to bear in
> > mind is that there are two major use-cases for i386, with requirements
> > that sometimes conflict:
>
> There was another option mentioned earlier in the thread that could
> help resolve some aspects of these conflicts; make 32-bit arches
> (or just i386) support both time_t ABIs, like glibc and Linux do.
>
> The 64-bit time_t ABI would be the default but the 32-bit time_t ABI
> would be present for running old binaries that still kind of work with
> the 32-bit ABIs after 2038, or under faketime when they do not.
Showing my $WORK bias a bit here by using the latest version of the
Steam Runtime (based on Debian 11) as an example of a "reasonably small"
library stack for running 32-bit binaries:
$ podman pull registry.gitlab.steamos.cloud/steamrt/sniper/sdk
$ podman run --rm -it registry.gitlab.steamos.cloud/steamrt/sniper/sdk
$ grep -rl '\<time_t\>' /usr/include
I see that libX11, ALSA, libstdc++, libcups, GLib, GNUTLS, GTK 3, libelf,
libpng, libsoup, libllvm, NSPR and OpenSSL all have time_t in their
APIs. In most cases that's going to reflect it being in their ABIs too.
In many cases it's probably a deprecated library call
(like g_bookmark_file_set_app_info(), which takes a time_t argument,
and is deprecated in favour of g_bookmark_file_set_application_info()
which takes a GDateTime object) but one of the things about legacy
binaries is that they'll continue to call into old ABIs, however hard
you might try to deprecate them.
Doing similar searches for timeval and timespec (which contain a time_t)
finds more relatively low-level libraries with time_t-sensitive ABIs.
glibc supports both time_t sizes by using heroic efforts to do so,
and conditionally redefining various symbols. I'm not at all sure that
that scales beyond glibc, particularly for libraries like libX11 that
are already on life-support; and if we switch to 64-bit time_t *before*
giving all of those libraries similar elaborate symbol-renaming, then
it'll be too late, because their ABI will have already changed and it
would be equally disruptive to go back.
smcv
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 06:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> - 2023-05-17 07:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 22:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Florian Lohoff <f@zz.de> - 2023-05-22 10:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 07:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-05-18 12:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 16:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-18 18:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Olaf Titz <olaf@bigred.inka.de> - 2023-06-26 20:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 16:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Christoph Biedl <debian.axhn@manchmal.in-ulm.de> - 2023-05-18 21:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 21:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-05-17 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 07:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-05-28 21:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 14:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-17 17:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 03:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 21:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 05:40 +0200
i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 13:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 14:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 16:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 16:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 16:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2023-05-19 17:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2023-05-25 13:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 17:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 18:00 +0200
partial support for i386 (Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)) Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 19:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2023-05-22 12:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 17:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 18:00 +0200
Bug#1036358: release-notes: Debian 12 expected to be last release w/ installer for i386 Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-19 17:40 +0200
Re: Bug#1036358: release-notes: Debian 12 expected to be last release w/ installer for i386 Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 19:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 19:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 20:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> - 2023-05-19 21:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-19 22:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> - 2023-05-19 22:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> - 2023-05-20 07:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-20 14:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-05-31 01:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 06:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2023-05-31 14:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Sven Hoexter <sven@stormbind.net> - 2023-05-31 16:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 18:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-31 20:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-31 21:30 +0200
Re: Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 07:00 +0200
Re: Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-31 10:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 12:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2023-05-31 13:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Sven Hoexter <sven@stormbind.net> - 2023-05-31 16:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-05-31 18:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-05-31 23:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2023-06-01 00:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2023-06-01 15:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-06-02 19:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2023-06-02 21:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2023-06-02 23:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-01 03:40 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> - 2023-06-01 14:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com> - 2023-06-08 02:20 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 17:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-05-19 19:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-05-19 20:10 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-19 20:50 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-20 00:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-21 08:00 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Roger Lynn <Roger@rilynn.me.uk> - 2023-05-26 01:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-26 06:50 +0200
Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2023-05-20 09:20 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> - 2023-05-20 11:30 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2023-05-20 18:50 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org> - 2023-05-21 20:00 +0200
Re: Using i386 by mistake on 64-bit hardware [was Re: i386 in the future 32-bit archs: a proposal)] James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-05-22 14:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-20 05:30 +0200
Re: i386 in the future Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-05-20 10:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-23 03:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 04:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-06-14 06:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2023-06-17 17:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-18 08:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-20 02:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-05-20 13:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2023-05-20 17:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-23 03:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-05-23 03:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-06-06 09:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 12:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 13:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2023-06-06 17:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 20:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 21:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Alexis Murzeau <amubtdx@gmail.com> - 2023-06-06 21:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 21:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Andreas Metzler <ametzler@bebt.de> - 2023-06-08 07:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 21:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 07:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Bastien ROUCARIES <roucaries.bastien@gmail.com> - 2023-06-08 08:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Hakan Bayındır <hakan@bayindir.org> - 2023-06-08 10:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2023-06-08 11:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 06:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2023-06-09 11:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2023-06-09 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 17:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-06-09 01:30 +0200
Re: multiarch vs. multilib Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 11:00 +0200
Re: multiarch vs. multilib nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-06-11 10:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 05:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 11:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 06:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 08:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> - 2023-07-05 18:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-06-06 21:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2023-06-08 19:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2023-06-08 20:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-06-08 21:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 19:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org> - 2023-06-26 21:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net> - 2023-06-27 10:20 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 11:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 18:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 23:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-07-07 01:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 22:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 06:40 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> - 2023-06-07 09:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal "Peter Van Eynde" <pvaneynd@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 10:30 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2023-06-07 12:50 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2023-06-07 13:10 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 19:00 +0200
Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-07-06 19:20 +0200
[i386] adlibtracker2 and fp-units-i386 Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2023-06-07 15:40 +0200
Constructive contributions (was: Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal) Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2023-06-09 13:30 +0200
csiph-web