Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.project > #13106

Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]

Show all headers | View raw

>>>>> "Ansgar" == Ansgar  <ansgar@43-1.org> writes:


    Ansgar> I would very much prefer explicit sexual content over Nazi
    Ansgar> symbols. So let me make a suggestion:

As would I.
If anyone wants to work on the challenges of adult content feel free to
reach out and I'd be happy to spend some of my time on that.

I am not particularly interested in  erotica in Debian, so much as
software to promote sexual freedom.

I think there are legal challenges to sexually explicit content in
Debian.
And yes, there absolutely are legal challenges to some things related to
nazis in in Debian.

I think one thing that Andrew and I both failed to include in our
summaries is that there is a strong consensus we should not distribute
things that are illegal to distribute.
I think there's a consensus that if parts of fortunes-off that are
illegal to distribute they should not be distributed.
I think there is disagreement about how credible any such claims are.

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-11-23 19:20 +0100
  Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2022-11-23 20:20 +0100
    Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-11-23 20:50 +0100
    ITA: fortunes-mod (was: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]) "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> - 2022-11-23 22:20 +0100
      Re: ITA: fortunes-mod (was: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2022-11-23 23:20 +0100
        Re: ITA: fortunes-mod (was: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]) Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-23 23:40 +0100
      Re: ITA: fortunes-mod (was: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?]) Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-23 23:40 +0100
  Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-23 20:50 +0100
    Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> - 2022-11-24 00:00 +0100
      Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2022-11-24 00:30 +0100
      Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2022-11-24 01:20 +0100
  Re: SUMMARY [Was Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?] Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org> - 2022-11-23 22:00 +0100

csiph-web