Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #6177

Debian Security Tracker - `no-dsa` Clarification

From Hadas Bloom <hadas.bloom@snyk.io>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Debian Security Tracker - `no-dsa` Clarification
Date 2022-11-21 11:40 +0100
Message-ID <Fucnv-5hbl-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hello!

My name is Hadas, I'm in the Snyk Security Group. I've been in contact with
you a while back regarding the `no-dsa` field and its different tags.

I just want to further confirm if our understanding of the usage of the
various terms (`no-dsa`, `ignored`, `postponed`, "Minor issue") is correct:

1. From this
<https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development#:~:text=%22no%2Ddsa%22%20is,the%20victim%27s%20infrastructure.>
documentation
it seems that "Minor issue" should not be used for drawing conclusions on
the severity of the vulnerability, but from this
<https://security-team.debian.org/security_tracker.html#issues-not-warranting-a-security-advisory:~:text=Sometimes%20an%20issue%20might%20not%20warrant%20an%20(immediate)%20security%20advisory%2C%20for%20example%20if%20its%20severity%20is%20minor.%20When%20that%27s%20the%20case%2C%20they%20are%20marked%20with%20a%20distribution%20tag%2C%20the%20%3Cno%2Ddsa%3E%20state%20and%20an%20explanation.>
documentation
it does seem like the severity might mean "minor" in these cases. Could you
please clarify that?

2. In our previous conversation there was a suggestion only to use the
`ignored` and `postponed` tags to understand the priority of the
vulnerability.
I do see that there are certain vulnerabilities, for example CVE-2022-45198
<https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-45198> in Buster,
that are only marked with "Minor issue" in the `no-dsa` field, and don't
have either of the `ignored` or `postponed` tags. Could you please help us
understand what we should do in such cases? What does the "Minor issue"
suggest here?


Thank you for the help,
Hadas

Hadas Bloom
Senior Security Analyst




 

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Debian Security Tracker - `no-dsa` Clarification Hadas Bloom <hadas.bloom@snyk.io> - 2022-11-21 11:40 +0100
  Re: Debian Security Tracker - `no-dsa` Clarification Sylvain Beucler <beuc@beuc.net> - 2022-11-21 15:00 +0100

csiph-web