Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1122167
| From | Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | Bug#1022573: transition: procps |
| Date | 2022-10-24 11:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Fk1D3-gnjK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition The procps library is now finally changing. Over 20 years ago there was a library to assist with the procps binaries but the API wasn't very good nor not really intentioned for use outside procps. The Bad: This change is a major API change. Basically nothing is like what was before as far as the API is concerned. The library is still about parsing the /proc filesystem but that's about it. All packages will need patching and/or updating. The Good: Upstream/me is able to provide patches as we've done these fixes already. Upstream has an issue tracking the dependent packages at[1] The impacted packages are: * apitrace - Untested patches available * cpu-x - Upstream updated to new (interim API) minor fixes to get it working * deepin-screen-recorder - Embeds old pointers into functions, needs work * intel-gpu-tools - Patches available, upstream working on issue * obs-advanced-scene-switches - Have patches for 4.0.0, minor fix to get them to new API * openscap - Have patches for 4.0.0, minor fix for new API * veyon - No patches but a way forward I can work with the relevant developers to get the API changed. - Craig 1: https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/issues/239 Ben file: title = "procps"; is_affected = .depends ~ /libproc2\-0|libproc\-dev|libprocps[0-9]|libprocps\-dev/; is_good = .depends ~ /libproc2\-0|libproc\-dev/; is_bad = .depends ~ /libprocps[0-9]|libprocps\-dev/;
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2022-10-24 11:10 +0200
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2022-11-10 23:10 +0100
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2022-12-21 20:00 +0100
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2022-12-21 21:50 +0100
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2022-12-21 22:00 +0100
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2022-12-21 22:40 +0100
Bug#1022573: transition: procps Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 00:40 +0100
Bug#1022573: transition: procps ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 17:40 +0100
Bug#1022573: lxqt-session is affected by procps transition ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debian.org> - 2022-12-06 17:40 +0100
Bug#1022573: lxqt-session is affected by procps transition Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2022-12-06 23:40 +0100
Bug#1022573: lxqt-session is affected by procps transition ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@debian.org> - 2022-12-07 03:10 +0100
Bug#1022573: lxqt-session is affected by procps transition Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> - 2022-12-08 18:20 +0100
Bug#1022573: procps transition status at Dec 22 Craig Small <csmall@debian.org> - 2022-12-22 00:50 +0100
csiph-web