Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.devel > #106819
| From | Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel |
| Subject | Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer |
| Date | 2023-01-14 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FNNFT-lq4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FNEjf-fov-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FNNFT-lq4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:11:00PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:11:40PM -0500, nick black wrote: > > it's 2023 and imho time to stop supporting unshadowed passwords > > from the installer. > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/user-setup/-/merge_requests/5 > > > > 1) nis (and possibly conserver?) seem the primary drivers of an > > unshadowed passwd.=20 > > > > let me freely admit that, despite the advanced age of forty-two > > (seventy-eight in UNIX years), that i know nothing about nis/yp > > except that there was a big o'reilly book about it back when one > > read the security book with the big safe on the front and the > > scripting book with the big drill. i suspect it's basically a > > halfway point between syncing /etc/passwd and /etc/hosts with > > cron+rsh, and hiring someone on whom you can inflict ldap? so > > please correct me wherever i'm woefully ignorant. > > > > ...but it appears that NIS can be made to work with shadowed > > passwords (though without their benefits). this is from a > > cursory reading of a FAQ last updated in 2003, so take it with a > > grain of salt. the "linux network administrators [sic] guide" > > seems to confirm this, and can also help you set up IPX or UUCP. > [snip] > > i'm absolutely not suggesting we stop supporting NIS or other > > programs which rely on unshadowed passwords. it's a big ol' > > tent, and we have more than enough room for you to carry forth > > the torch of Solaris 2. i just don't think this belongs in the > > installer anymore. > > I know what NIS/YP is, I know of a couple of places where it is > still in use, and, as Mark Haber said, the people running those Um. Many apologies. Of course it's Marc. > places know how to find and flip a switch. -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@debian.org pp@storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
Back to linux.debian.devel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 03:20 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de> - 2023-01-14 10:00 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 15:20 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-01-15 14:30 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2023-01-14 13:20 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> - 2023-01-14 13:20 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2023-01-15 01:00 +0100
Re: need we support unshadowed passwords from the installer nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 20:10 +0100
csiph-web