Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #274228
| Date | 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Nu vind ik je een afgeneukte geknapte kontenkuiser. |
| Message-ID | <F1A45370.D4EC4EB2@Melissococcus.Polycephalus.Haemolamae> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <su2dnbXIAZcF6ELInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <op.x31r7kn2tm21m2@benson.localhost> <e01ed885a055f4f6646c537f0f965630@dizum.com> <op.x33aoip9tm21m2@benson.localhost> <b7a9f3535d1c30e784011c6fd34d908b@dizum.com> |
| Subject | Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) |
| From | Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, damn thee, odious caterpillar, ye apple-polished: > "TIME" *TO* "SPIN" *THE* "KOOKS" *UP* "AGAIN". *MELT*, "KOOKS", > *MELT*. "<SNICKER>" > > "ROBERT" *M*. "WOLFE" *THE* "PITTSBURGH" *PIED* "PIPER" *OF* "PENIS" > *(AKA* "DILDORIDER)" *OF* "5907" *STANTON* "AVE.", *PITTSBURGH*, > "PA" *(AKA* "TEH" *MOP* "JOCKEY)", *SOCKED* "UP" *AS* > "ROOT@127.0.0.1", *IN* "<NEWS:OP.X33AOIP9TM21M2@BENSON.LOCALHOST>" > *DID* "THUSLY" *JUMP* "HEAD" *FIRST* "INTO" *THE* "WOOD" *CHIPPER* > "AGAIN": > >> On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:31:37 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of >>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as >>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x31r7kn2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did >>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:39:11 -0400, Rocky (aka >>>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) >>>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> ROT<SMACKAKOOK!> > >>>> why do i also have the feeling that you are one of these people who >>>> believe that the "government can't do anything right", except when some >>>> hyper-complex conspiracy is involved. >>>> >>>> that would be as k0oky as denying what a majority of climate scientists >>>> have to say about climate change. > >>> Or as kooky as believing a majority of scientists agree about >>> something which they clearly don't: >>> >>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree >>> humans are causing global warming >>> >>> SPNAK! #4 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie: >>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com> >>> ========================================================= >>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97% >>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human >>> caused!". >>> >>> Where did this 97% figure come from? >>> >>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as >>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it >>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the >>> University of Queensland. >>> >>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts >>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate >>> science articles. >>> >>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his >>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no >>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed >>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were >>> uncertain." >>> >>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on >>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract >>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on >>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus >>> position that humans are causing the warming." >>> >>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482 >>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that >>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all >>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research >>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed) >>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC >>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on. >>> >>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and >>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass >>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could, >>> that hard math eludes them. >>> ========================================================= >>> >>> Doh! Stoooopid libtard *still* can't figure out that hard math. LOL > >> "stooopid libtard" can prove that james cook would tell you to take your >> global cooling myth and stuff it: > > "YOU" *STAYED* "UP" *ALL* "NIGHT" *RAPING* "GOOGLE" *AGAIN*, > "DIDN'T" *YOU*, "DILDORIDER"? *YOU* "POOR" *PATHETIC* "BASTARD". > *NOW* "YOU'RE" *GOING* "TO" *GET* "BOOTFUCKED" *SO* "HARD" *YOU* > "WON'T" *EVER* "BE" *THE* "SAME" *AGAIN*. "LOL" > >> http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2010/12/skeptical-science-founder-john-cook/ >> >> "With an undergraduate education in physics from the University of >> Queensland and a post-graduate honors year studying solar physics, Cook >> says his interest in climate science was sparked when he was given a copy >> of a speech by Oklahoma Republican Senator James Inhofe, most known to >> climate professionals for having attached the “greatest hoax known to man” >> tag to anthropogenic climate change." > > "WHAT'S" *ANY* "OF" *THE* "ABOVE" *GOT* "TO" *DO* "WITH" *THE* > "FALSIFIED" *"97%"* "K'LAME" *YOU* "LIBTARD" *KLIMATE* "KATASTROPHE" > *KOOKS* "ARE" *MAKING*, "DILDORIDER"? *EXCEPT* "THAT" *JOHN* "COOK" > *HIMSELF* "ADMITS" *HE'S* "NOT" *A* "CLIMATE" *SCIENTIST*. "AND" > *THE* "FACT" *THAT* "HIS" *"STUDY"* "IS" *UTTER* "AND" *COMPLETE* > "FRAUDULENT" *AND* "FICTIONAL" *BULLSHIT*. "LOL" > > "<HTTP://WWW.POPULARTECHNOLOGY.NET/2012/03/TRUTH-ABOUT-SKEPTICAL-SCIENCE.HTML>" > >> looks like you won't be able to use your "james > > "YOU" *MEAN* "JOHN"? *LOL* > > "PUT" *DOWN* "THE" *CRACK* "PIPE", *CRACKIE* "MCCRACKHEAD". *LOL* > >> cook" mythology anymore to try to back your k'lames that are >> unfounded and unpopular with climate scientists. D'OH!!! > > "PUT" *DOWN* "THE" *CRACK* "PIPE", *CRACKIE* "MCCRACKHEAD". *LOL* > >> from james > > "YOU" *MEAN* "JOHN"? *LOL* > > "PUT" *DOWN* "THE" *CRACK* "PIPE", *CRACKIE* "MCCRACKHEAD". *LOL* > >> cook's own website (LOL!): >> >> https://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_James_Inhofe.htm >> >> Climate Myth: >> "this 97% [of climate scientists accepting human-caused global warming], >> that doesn't mean anything. I named literally thousands of scientists on >> the floor...and these were top people." >> 14 March 2012 (Source) >> >> What the Science Says: >> 97% of climate experts agree humans are causing global warming. > > "THE" *ACTUAL* "NUMBERS" *SHOW* "THE" *LIBTARD* "KLIMATE" > *KATASTROPHE* "KOOK" *"CONSENSUS"* "IS" *COLLAPSING*. "LOL" > > "<HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/WATCH?V=OY-LVHNM5FA>" *33* "OF" *THE* "50" > *MOST-CITED* "PAPERS" *ON* "CLIMATE" *CHANGE* "WERE" *OMITTED* "IN" > *THE* "COOK" *ET*. "AL". *"STUDY"*. "8,000" *PAPERS* "THAT" > *COULDN'T* "BE" *FRAUDULENTLY* "MISCLASSIFIED" *WERE* "IGNORED", > *AND* "MANY" *OTHER* "PAPERS" *BY* "THE" *FOLLOWING* "SCIENTISTS" > *WRONGLY* "CATEGORIZED" *BY* "COOK" *ET*. "AL". *(2013)* "IN" *A* > "CLASSIC" *CASE* "OF" *CHERRY-PICKING*. > > "HERE" *ARE* "SOME" *OF* "THE" *SCIENTIST'S* "RESPONSES": > > "PROF". *CRAIG* "D". *IDSO*: ""THAT" *IS* "NOT" *AN* "ACCURATE" > *REPRESENTATION* "OF" *MY* "PAPER."" > > "DR". *NICOLA* "SCAFETTA": *"COOK* "ET" *AL*. "(2013)" *IS* "BASED" > *ON* "A" *STRAWMAN* "ARGUMENT" *BECAUSE* "IT" *DOES* "NOT" > *CORRECTLY* "DEFINE" *THE* "IPCC" *AGW* "THEORY..."" > > "PROFESSOR" *NIR* "J". *SHAVIV*: ""NOPE". *IT* "IS" *NOT* "AN" > *ACCURATE* "REPRESENTATION."" > > "DR". *ALAIN* "CARLIN": *"NO*, "IF" *COOK* "ET" *AL'S* "PAPER" > *CLASSIFIES* "MY" *PAPER*. "AS" *"EXPLICITLY* "ENDORSES" *AGW* "BUT" > *DOES* "NOT" *QUANTIFY* "OR" *MINIMIZE"*, "NOTHING" *COULD* "BE" > *FURTHER* "FROM" *EITHER* "MY" *INTENT* "OR" *THE* "CONTENTS" *OF* > "MY" *PAPER*. "I" *BELIEVE* "THAT" *THERE* "IS" *SUFFICIENT* > "EVIDENCE" *CONCERNING* "MISCLASSIFICATION" *THAT* "COOK" *ET* > "AL'S" *PAPER* "SHOULD" *BE* "WITHDRAWN" *BY* "THE" *AUTHORS* "AND" > *THE* "DATA" *REANALYZED*, "PREFERABLY" *BY* "LESS-BIASED" > *REVIEWERS."* > > "PROFESSOR" *NILS-AXEL* "MORNER": *"CERTAINLY* "NOT" *CORRECT* "AND" > *CERTAINLY* "MISLEADING". *MY* "PAPERS" *ARE* "STRONGLY" *AGAINST* > "AGW."" > > "PROFESSOR" *WILLIE* "SOON": *"THIS* "RATING" *OF* "'NO" *POSITION* > "ON" *AGW* "BY" *CO2'* "IS" *NOWHERE* "ACCURATE" *NOR* "CORRECT."" > > "PROFESSOR" *RICHARD* "TOL": *"7* "OUT" *OF* "10" *ASSESSED* > "PAPERS" *WERE* "WRONGLY" *CLASSIFIED*, "ANOTHER" *112* "WERE" > *COMPLETELY* "OMITTED"! *OF* "THESE", *111* "(99%)" *WERE* > "NEUTRAL". *I* "THINK" *(THEIR)* "DATA" *ARE* "A" *LOAD* "OF" > *CRAP*. "I" *THINK* "(THEIR)" *SAMPLING* "STRATEGY" *IS* "A" *LOAD* > "OF" *NONSENSE."* > > "DOUBLE" *D'OH*! > >> DOUBLE D'OH!!! > > "DOUBLE" *D'OH*! "ON" *THE* "FACT" *THAT* "HIS" *OWN* "REPORT" > *SAYS*: "==================================================" *WHAT* > "COOK'S" *STUDY* "PURPORTED" *TO* "DO" *WAS* "TO" *REVIEW* "THE" > *ABSTRACTS* "(NOT" *THE* "ENTIRE" *PAPERS*, "JUST" *THE* > "ABSTRACTS)" *OF* "11,000" *CLIMATE* "SCIENCE" *ARTICLES*. > > "BUT" *WHEN* "YOU" *READ* "THE" *FIRST* "PARAGRAPH" *OF* "COOK'S" > *ABSTRACT* "FOR" *HIS* "STUDY", *IT* "SAYS", *"WE* "FIND" *THAT* > "66.4%" *OF* "ABSTRACTS" *EXPRESSED* "NO" *POSITION* "ON" > *ANTHROPOGENIC* "GLOBAL" *WARMING*, "32.6%" *ENDORSED* > "ANTHROPOGENIC" *GLOBAL* "WARMING", *0.7%* "REJECTED" *IT*, "AND" > *0.3%* "WERE" *UNCERTAIN."* > > "THAT" *MEANS* "ONLY" *1/3* "OF" *THOSE* "PAPERS" *HAD* "AN" > *OPINION* "ON" *HUMAN-CAUSED* "GLOBAL" *WARMING*. "THE" *NEXT* > "SENTENCE" *IN* "COOK'S" *ABSTRACT* "FOR" *HIS* "STUDY" *SAYS*, > ""AMONG" *ABSTRACTS* "EXPRESSING" *A* "POSITION" *ON* "HUMAN-CAUSED" > *GLOBAL* "WARMING", *97.1%* "ENDORSED" *THE* "CONSENSUS" *POSITION* > "THAT" *HUMANS* "ARE" *CAUSING* "THE" *WARMING."* > > "OF" *COURSE*, "COOK" *EXPOSES* "HIS" *BIAS* "IN" *THE* "SENTENCE" > *IMMEDIATELY* "ABOVE" *BY* "K'LAMING" *THERE* "*IS*" *A* > "CONSENSUS", *DESPITE* "HIS" *OWN* "NUMBERS" *PROVING* "THERE" *IS* > "NOT". *HE* "THEN" *WENT* "ON" *TO* "MISCLASSIFY" *PAPERS* "AND" > *OMIT* "THOSE" *HE* "COULDN'T" *MISCLASSIFY* "IN" *ORDER* "TO" > *MANUFACTURE* "HIS" *K'LAMED* ""CONSENT"". > > "11000" *** ".326" *=* "3586" *** ".971" *=* "3482" *(3482* "/" > *11000)* "*" *100* "=" *31.65%* "OF" *CLIMATE* "SCIENTISTS" *AGREE* > "THAT" *GLOBAL* "WARMING" *IS* "HUMAN-CAUSED". *AND* "THOSE" > *31.65%* "AREN'T" *EVEN* "ALL" *"CLIMATE* "SCIENTISTS"". *A* "GOOD" > *MAJORITY* "OF" *THEM* "ARE" *RESEARCH* "ASSISTANTS" *AND* "COLLEGE" > *STUDENTS* "WHO" *WRITE* "THE" *(NON-PEER* "REVIEWED)" *PAPERS* > "THAT" *THE* "LEAD" *RESEARCHERS* "(MAINLY" *ASSOCIATED* "WITH" > *THE* "IPCC" *AND* "OTHER" *POLITICIZED* ""SCIENTIFIC"" *ENTITIES)* > "PUT" *THEIR* "NAMES" *ON*. > "==================================================" > > "STILL" *HAVING* "TROUBLE" *GRASPING* "THAT" *BASIC* "MATH", > *DILDORIDER*? "PERHAPS" *THE* "LIBTARD" *COOK* "IS" *HAVING* > "TROUBLE" *UNDERSTANDING* "THE" *BASIC* "MATH", *AS* "WELL". *OR* > "PERHAPS" *HE'S* "A" *LYING* "LIBTARD" *KLIMATE* "KATASTROPHE" > *KOOK* "LIKE" *YOU*. "LOL" > >> now, how's about you and your dreamt-up k0okyKonservative wignut klimate >> konspiracy theories frig right off? > > "POINT" *1*: > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* "OH", > *WHAT* "WILL" *YOU* "DO" *WHEN* "YOUR" *BELOVED* > "SKEPTICALSCIENCE.COM" *AGREES* "WITH" *ME*, "DILDORIDER"? *LOL* > > "<HTTPS://WWW.SKEPTICALSCIENCE.COM/GLOBAL-WARMING-SCIENTIFIC-CONSENSUS-ADVANCED.HTM>" > *==================================================* "97%" *OF* > "CLIMATE" *PAPERS* "STATING" *A* "POSITION" *ON* "HUMAN-CAUSED" > *GLOBAL* "WARMING" *AGREE* "GLOBAL" *WARMING* "IS" *HAPPENING*. > "AND" *WE* "ARE" *THE* "CAUSE."" > > ""BASED" *ON* "OUR" *ABSTRACT* "RATINGS", *WE* "FOUND" *THAT* "JUST" > *OVER* "4,000" *PAPERS* "(OUT" *OF* "12,000" *ABSTRACTS)* > "EXPRESSED" *A* "POSITION" *ON* "THE" *CAUSE* "OF" *GLOBAL* > "WARMING", *97.1%* "OF" *WHICH* "ENDORSED" *HUMAN-CAUSED* "GLOBAL" > *WARMING."* "==================================================" > > "4000" */* "12000" *=* "33.3%" *OF* "ALL" *PAPERS* "STATED" *A* > "POSITION". > > "SEE" *THE* "DISTINCTION" *THERE*, "DILDORIDER"? *97%* "OF" > **PAPERS** "*STATING*" **A** "*POSITION*", *NOT* "97%" *OF* > "CLIMATE" *SCIENTISTS*. "YOUR" *FALLACY* "OF" *EQUIVOCATION* "IS" > *CUTE* "BUT" *UTTER* "BULLSHIT". *FROM* "COOK'S" *OWN* "STUDY" > *ABOVE*, "ONLY" *32.6%* "OF" *ALL* "PAPERS" *STATED* "A" *POSITION*. > "AND" *THAT* "WAS" **WITH** "COOK" *ET*. "AL". *MISCLASSIFYING* "A" > *BUNCH* "OF" *THEM*, "AND" *OMITTING* "THAT" *WHICH* "HE" *KNEW* > "HE" *COULDN'T* "GET" *AWAY* "WITH" *MISCLASSIFYING*. "WHICH" > *CORROBORATES* "MY" *MATH* "ABOVE": > > "11000" *** ".326" *=* "3586" *** ".971" *=* "3482" *(3482* "/" > *11000)* "*" *100* "=" *31.65%* "OF" *CLIMATE* "SCIENTISTS" *AGREE* > "THAT" *GLOBAL* "WARMING" *IS* "HUMAN-CAUSED". *AND* "THOSE" > *31.65%* "AREN'T" *EVEN* "ALL" *"CLIMATE* "SCIENTISTS"". *A* "GOOD" > *MAJORITY* "OF" *THEM* "ARE" *RESEARCH* "ASSISTANTS" *AND* "COLLEGE" > *STUDENTS* "WHO" *WRITE* "THE" *(NON-PEER* "REVIEWED)" *PAPERS* > "THAT" *THE* "LEAD" *RESEARCHERS* "(MAINLY" *ASSOCIATED* "WITH" > *THE* "IPCC" *AND* "OTHER" *POLITICIZED* ""SCIENTIFIC"" *ENTITIES)* > "PUT" *THEIR* "NAMES" *ON*. > > "AND" *BOTH* "THE" *COOK* "STUDY" **AND** "THE" > *SKEPTICALSCIENCE.COM* "FOLLOW-UP" *COLLABORATION* "WITH" *JOHN* > "COOK" *WERE* "DEBUNKED" *THOROUGHLY*: > "<HTTP://LINK.SPRINGER.COM/ARTICLE/10.1007/S11191-013-9647-9#PAGE-1>" > *CLIMATE* "CONSENSUS" *AND* "'MISINFORMATION'": *A* "REJOINDER" *TO* > "AGNOTOLOGY", *SCIENTIFIC* "CONSENSUS", *AND* "THE" *TEACHING* "AND" > *LEARNING* "OF" *CLIMATE* "CHANGE" > > ""IN" *THEIR* "REPLY", *BEDFORD* "AND" *COOK* "(SCI" *EDUC* > "22:2019–2030", *2013)*, "SEEKING" *TO* "APPLY" *AGNOTOLOGY* "TO" > *CLIMATE* "SCIENCE", *ASSERTED* "THAT" *FOSSIL-FUEL* "INTERESTS" > *HAD* "PROMOTED" *DOUBT* "ABOUT" *A* "CLIMATE" *CONSENSUS*. "THEIR" > *DEFINITION* "OF" *CLIMATE* "‘MISINFORMATION’" *WAS* "CONTINGENT" > *UPON* "THE" *POST-MODERNIST* "ASSUMPTIONS" *THAT* "SCIENTIFIC" > *TRUTH* "IS" *DISCERNIBLE* "BY" *MEASURING* "A" *CONSENSUS* "AMONG" > *EXPERTS*, "AND" *THAT* "A" *NEAR* "UNANIMOUS" *CONSENSUS* "EXISTS". > *HOWEVER*, "INSPECTION" *OF* "A" *CLAIM* "BY" *COOK* "ET" *AL*. > "(ENVIRON" *RES* "LETT" *8:024024*, "2013)" *OF* "97.1" *%* > "CONSENSUS", *HEAVILY* "RELIED" *UPON* "BY" *BEDFORD* "AND" *COOK*, > "SHOWS" *JUST* "0.3" *%* "ENDORSEMENT" *OF* "THE" *STANDARD* > "DEFINITION" *OF* "CONSENSUS": *THAT* "MOST" *WARMING* "SINCE" > *1950* "IS" *ANTHROPOGENIC."* > > "D'OH"! *DID* "YOU" *GET* "THAT", *DILDORIDER*? "COOK" *ET*. "AL". > *LIED*, "CHERRY-PICKED" *AND* "OUTRIGHT" *FALSIFIED* "THEIR" *DATA*, > "SAME" *AS* "ALL" *THE* "OTHER" *KLIMATE* "KATASTROPHE" *KOOKS* > "DID" *WHEN* "TRYING" *TO* "SELL" *THEIR* "ALARMIST" *BULLSHIT* "AS" > *STEAK*. "AND" *THEY* "ALL" *GOT* "CAUGHT". *CLIMATEGATE* "1.0" > *AND* "CLIMATEGATE" *2.0*, "REMEMBER"? *AND* "NOW" *WE* "HAVE" > *CARTOONYGATE* "BY" *THE* "FAILED" *CARTOONIST* "JOHN" *COOK*. "LOL" > > "LIES", *DAMNED* "LIES" *AND* "STATISTICS". *AND* "THE" *LIBTARD* > "KLIMATE" *KATASTROPHE* "KOOKS" *USE* "ALL" *THREE*. "TOO" *BAD* > "THEY'RE" *ALL* "TOO" *FUCKING* "STUPID" *TO* "GET" *AWAY* "WITH" > *IT*. "LOL" > > "SPNAK"! *ON* "THE" *MATH-CHALLENGED* "LITTLE" *EMO* "SCARECROW" > *FREAK*. "LOL" > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" > > "***************************************************" > ***************************************************** "ARE" *YA* > "*FEELING*" *THE* "BOOTFUCK" *YET*, "DILDORIDER"? *LOL* > "***************************************************" > ***************************************************** > > "POINT" *2* "-" *ANOTHER* ""97%"" *MYTH*: > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* "THE" > *97%* "NUMBER" *WAS* "CREATED" *BY* "METICULOUSLY" *SELECTING* > "CERTAIN" *SURVEYS* "USING" *MURKY* "TERMINOLOGY" *TO* "FORMULATE" > *A* "SPECIFIC" *NARRATIVE*. > > "FOR" *EXAMPLE*, "ONE" *OF* "THE" *MAIN* "SOURCES" *OF* "THE" *97%* > "MYTH" *IS* "A" *2009* "ARTICLE" *BY* "A" *STUDENT/TEACHER* "COMBO" > *AT* "THE" *UNIVERSITY* "OF" *ILLINOIS* "BY" *THE* "NAME" *OF* > "DORAN" *AND* "ZIMMERMAN". *THE* "TWO" *OF* "THEM" *CONDUCTED* "A" > *TWO* "QUESTION" *ONLINE* "POLL" *WHICH* "CONCLUDED" *THAT* "9" > *OUT* "OF" *10* "SCIENTISTS" *AGREED* "TEMPERATURES" *WERE* "RISING" > *AND* "MANKIND" *WAS* "THE" *DRIVING* "FORCE". *THE* "SURVEY" *WAS* > "VERY" *HEAVY* "ON" *TEMPERATURE* "CHANGES" *BUT* "VERY" *LIGHT* > "ON" *HOW* "HUMANS" *PLAYED* "A" *ROLE* "WHICH" *ESSENTIALLY* "ONLY" > *CONFIRMED* "THAT" *MANY* "SCIENTISTS" *BELIEVE* "THE" *CLIMATE* > "IS" *CHANGING*, "WHICH" *ISN’T* "EVEN" *REMOTELY* "UNUSUAL". > > "ANOTHER" *PROBLEM* "WITH" *THIS* "SURVEY" *WAS* "THAT" *THE* > "“SCIENTISTS”" *WHO* "WERE" *SURVEYED* "WERE" *SCIENTISTS* "IN" > *THE* "SAME" *WAY* "BILL" *NYE* "THE" *SCIENCE* "GUY" *IS* "A" > *SCIENTIST* "(HE’S" *NOT*, "HIS" *HIGHEST* "LEVEL" *OF* "EDUCATION" > *IS* "A" *BACHELOR’S* "DEGREE" *IN* "ENGINEERING)". *STRANGELY*, > "ONLY" *79* "OF" *THE* "3100" *RESPONSES* "TO" *THIS* "POLL" *WERE* > "FROM" *PEOPLE* "WHO" *CONSIDERED* "THEMSELVES" *EXPERTS* "IN" > *CLIMATE* "SCIENCE". *THIS* "SURVEY" *WAS* "CLEARLY" *NOT* "THE" > *LANDSLIDE* "STATEMENT" *THAT* "CLIMATE" *CHANGE* "BELIEVERS" *MADE* > "IT" *OUT* "TO" *BE*. > > "HTTP://ONLINELIBRARY.WILEY.COM/DOI/10.1002/EOST.V90.3/ISSUETOC" > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" > > "***********************************************************" > ************************************************************* "I" > *SAY*, "ARE" *YA* "*_FEELING_*" *THE* "BOOTFUCK" *YET*, > "DILDORIDER"? *LOL* > "***********************************************************" > ************************************************************* > > "POINT" *3* "-" *ANOTHER* ""97%"" *MYTH*: "ARE" *YOU* "GETTING" > *THE* "FEELING" *THE* "KLIMATE" *KATASTROPHE* "KOOKS" *HAD* "A" > *MEETING* "AND" *DECIDED* "UPON" *THE* "97%" *NUMBER* "AS" *HIGH* > "ENOUGH" *TO* "CONVINCE" *GULLIBLE* "LIBTARDS" *THAT* "THERE" *WAS* > "A" *CONSENSUS*? "LOL" > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" *THE* "97" > *PERCENT* "MYTH" *JUNE* "3", *2014* > > "GLOBAL" *WARMING* "ADVOCATES" *ROUTINELY* "TOSS" *OUT* "THE" > *STATISTIC* "THAT" *97* "PERCENT" *OF* "SCIENTISTS" *AGREE* "THAT" > *CLIMATE* "CHANGE" *IS* "REAL" *AND* "MAN-MADE". *WHERE* "DID" > *THAT* "FIGURE" *COME* "FROM"? *JOSEPH* "BAST", *PRESIDENT* "OF" > *THE* "HEARTLAND" *INSTITUTE*, "AND" *ROY* "SPENCER", *PRINCIPAL* > "RESEARCH" *SCIENTIST* "FOR" *THE* "UNIVERSITY" *OF* "ALABAMA" *IN* > "HUNTSVILLE", *EXPLAIN* "THE" *HISTORY* "BEHIND" *THE* "MISLEADING" > *NUMBER*. > > "IN" *SHORT*, "THERE" *IS* "NO" *BASIS* "FOR" *THE* "CLAIM" *THAT* > "97" *PERCENT* "OF" *SCIENTISTS* "BELIEVE" *THAT* "MAN-MADE" > *CLIMATE* "CHANGE" *IS* "A" *DANGEROUS* "PROBLEM". > > "IN" *2004*, "NAOMI" *ORESKES*, "A" *HARVARD* "SCIENCE" *HISTORIAN*, > "EXAMINED" *928* "ABSTRACTS" *OF* "SCIENTIFIC" *JOURNAL* "ARTICLES", > *FINDING* "THAT" *THREE-QUARTERS* "OF" *THEM* "BELIEVED" *THAT* > "HUMANS" *WERE* "RESPONSIBLE" *FOR* "MOST" *OF* "THE" *OBSERVED* > "WARMING" *OF* "THE" *LAST* "HALF-CENTURY". > > "HOWEVER", *ORESKES* "DID" *NOT* "ANALYZE" *ARTICLES* "BY" > *PROMINENT* "SCIENTISTS" *--* "SUCH" *AS* "RICHARD" *LINDZEN* "AND" > *JOHN* "CHRISTY" *--* "WHO" *QUESTION* "THE" *"CONSENSUS"* "VIEW". > *ADDITIONALLY*, "A" *RECENT* "STUDY" *IN* "NATURE" *MAGAZINE* > "CONFIRMS" *THAT* "ACADEMIC" *ABSTRACTS* "OFTEN" *CONTAIN* "CLAIMS" > *THAT* "ARE" *NOT* "PROVEN" *IN* "THE" *STUDIES* "THEMSELVES". > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" > > "BWAHAHAHA"! *A* "SCIENCE" **HISTORIAN*?*! "NO" *FORMAL* "CLIMATE" > *SCIENCE* "EDUCATION" *THERE*. "NOT" *A* "BIT". *AND* "SHE'S" > *AMPLY* "DEMONSTRATED" *HERSELF* "TO" *BE* "ONE" *OF* "THE" > *ALARMISM* "BLEATING" *KLIMATE* "KATASTROPHE" *KOOKS*. "LOL" > > "******************************************************************" > ******************************************************************** > "I" *SAY*, "I" *SAY*, "ARE" *YA* "*_FEELING_*" *THE* "BOOTFUCK" > *YET*, "DILDORIDER"? *LOL* > "******************************************************************" > ******************************************************************** > > "POINT" *4* "-" *ANOTHER* ""97%"" *MYTH*: "ARE" *YOU* "GETTING" > *THE* "*DEFINITE*" *FEELING* "THE" *KLIMATE* "KATASTROPHE" *KOOKS* > "HAD" *A* "MEETING" *AND* "DECIDED" *UPON* "THE" *97%* "NUMBER" *AS* > "HIGH" *ENOUGH* "TO" *CONVINCE* "GULLIBLE" *LIBTARDS* "THAT" *THERE* > "WAS" *A* "CONSENSUS", *THEN* "KEPT" *BLEATING* "THEIR" *WHOLLY* > "MANUFACTURED" *LIE* "IN" *HOPES* "IT'D" *FINALLY* "BE" *BELIEVED*? > "LOL" *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" *A* "2009" > *ARTICLE* "BY" *UNIVERSITY* "OF" *ILLINOIS* "STUDENT" *MAGGIE* > "KENDALL" *ZIMMERMAN* "AND" *HER* "MASTER'S" *THESIS* "ADVISER" > *PETER* "DORAN" *ALSO* "MADE" *THE* "97" *PERCENT* "CLAIM". > > "THE" *AUTHORS* "MADE" *THIS* "CONCLUSION" *AFTER* "CONDUCTING" *A* > "TWO-QUESTION" *ONLINE* "SURVEY" *OF* "3,146" *SCIENTISTS*, "ONLY" > *79* "OF" *WHICH* "WERE" *EXPERTS* "IN" *CLIMATE* "SCIENCE" *AND* > "HAD" *PUBLISHED* "HALF" *OF* "THEIR" *RECENT* "PEER-REVIEWED" > *PAPERS* "ON" *CLIMATE* "CHANGE". *IT* "DID" *NOT* "INCLUDE" *THE* > "SCIENTISTS" *MOST* "LIKELY" *TO* "UNDERSTAND" *THE* "NATURAL" > *CAUSES* "OF" *CLIMATE* "CHANGE": *SOLAR* "SCIENTISTS", *SPACE* > "SCIENTISTS", *COSMOLOGISTS*, "PHYSICISTS", *METEOROLOGISTS* "OR" > *ASTRONOMERS*. "MOREOVER", *THE* "SURVEY" *DID* "NOT" *SPECIFY* > "WHETHER" *THE* "HUMAN" *IMPACT* "ON" *GLOBAL* "WARMING" *WAS* > "LARGE" *ENOUGH* "TO" *CONSTITUTE* "A" *PROBLEM*. > "+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++" > *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* > > "ON" *THE* "OTHER" *HAND*, "WRITE" *BAST* "AND" *SPENCER*, "THE" > *PETITION* "PROJECT" *--* "A" *GROUP* "OF" *PHYSICISTS* "AND" > *PHYSICAL* "CHEMISTS" *IN* "CALIFORNIA" *--* "HAS" *COLLECTED* > "31,487" *SIGNATURES* "FROM" *AMERICAN* "SCIENTISTS" *AGREEING* > "THAT" *THERE* "IS" *"NO* "CONVINCING" *SCIENTIFIC* "EVIDENCE" > *THAT* "HUMAN" *RELEASE* "OF...CARBON" *DIOXIDE...OR* "OTHER" > *GREENHOUSE* "GASES" *IS* "CAUSING" *OR* "WILL", *IN* "THE" > *FORESEEABLE* "FUTURE", *CAUSE* "CATASTROPHIC" *HEATING* "OF" *THE* > "EARTH'S" *ATMOSPHERE* "AND" *DISRUPTION* "OF" *THE* "EARTH'S" > *CLIMATE."* > > "SOURCE": *JOSEPH* "BAST" *AND* "ROY" *SPENCER*, ""THE" *MYTH* "OF" > *THE* "CLIMATE" *CHANGE* "'97%'"" *WALL* "STREET" *JOURNAL*, "MAY" > *26*, "2014". > > "SO" *I'LL* "SEE" *YOUR* "MEASLY" *4,000* "KLIMATE" *KATASTROPHE* > "KOOK" *"ZOMG*! "GLORBUL" *WOARMINGS*! "DUUURRRHHHH!"" *PAPERS*, > "AND" *RAISE* "YOU" *MORE* "THAN" *THIRTY* "ONE" *THOUSAND* "FOUR" > *HUNDRED* "EIGHTY" *SEVEN* "SCIENTISTS" *(AND* "THAT'S" *JUST* "IN" > *THE* "US)" *WHO* "SAY" *"BULLSHIT"*. > > "HTTP://WWW.PETITIONPROJECT.ORG/" > > "IN" *FACT*, "I'LL" *THROW* "INTO" *THE* "POT" *NASA*, "UAH", *UK* > "MET" *AND* "RSS" *DATA* "PROVING" *THE* "PLANET'S" *BEEN* > "*COOLING*" *FOR* "THE" *WHOLE* "18" *YEARS* "YOU" *LIBTARD* > "KLIMATE" *KATASTROPHE* "KOOKS" *HAVE* "BEEN" *SCREAMING* ""ZOMG"! > *GLEURBIL* "WOAERMINGS"! *DUUURRRRHHH!"*. "LOL" > > "===============================================================" > *<HTTP://WWW.REPORTINGCLIMATESCIENCE.COM/NEWS-STORIES/ARTICLE/GLOBAL-WARMING-PAUSE-HITS-18-YEARS-ON-RSS-DATA.HTML>* > "USING" *UK* "MET", *UAH* "AND" *RSS* "DATA". > > "PAGE" *11* "-" *GLOBAL* "TEMPERATURE" *RATE* "(C" *PER* "YEAR)": > *DROPPING* "SINCE" *~1998*. "*NEGATIVE*" *SINCE* "~2005". *THAT* > "MEANS" *TEMPS* "HAVE" *BEEN* "DROPPING" *FOR* "~18" *YEARS*, "AND" > *THE* "GULLIBLE" *LIBTARDS* "HAVE" *BEEN* "LIED" *TO* "FOR" *~18* > "YEARS": > *<HTTP://WWW.METOFFICE.GOV.UK/MEDIA/PDF/E/F/PAPER1_OBSERVING_CHANGES_IN_THE_CLIMATE_SYSTEM.PDF>* > > "MESSAGE-ID": *<B41F4A8054430AC46092E607919D7063@DIZUM.COM>* "EVEN" > *NASA* "ADMITTED" *THAT* "GLOBAL" *TEMPERATURES* "WERE" *FALLING* > "IN" *RECENT* "YEARS" *(BEFORE* "THEY" *PULLED* "THAT" *PAGE*. > "LUCKILY" *THE* "WAYBACK" *MACHINE* "ARCHIVED" *IT)*: > "<HTTP://WEB.ARCHIVE.ORG/WEB/20030816225534/HTTP://ICP.GISS.NASA.GOV/RESEARCH/METHANE/GREENHOUSE.HTML>" > *NOTE* "THE" *CENTER* "TRACE" *FOR* "MODERN" *TIMES* "IN" *THAT* > "GRAPHIC". **FALLING** "TEMPERATURE", *EVEN* "AS" *CO2* "AND" > *METHANE* "ROSE". > *===============================================================* > > "AND" *I'LL* "EVEN" *TOSS* "IN" *THE* "PROOF" *THAT* "THE" *OCEANS* > "AREN'T" *ABSORBING* "ANY" *HEAT*: > "=================================================" > *<HTTP://SCIENCE.NASA.GOV/SCIENCE-NEWS/SCIENCE-AT-NASA/2014/06OCT_ABYSS/>* > "<HTTP://ICEAGENOW.INFO/2014/10/NASA-STUMPED-DEEP-OCEANS-WARMED-2005/>" > *"WHEN* "SCIENTISTS" *AT* "NASA'S" *JET* "PROPULSION" *LABORATORY* > "(JPL)" *IN* "PASADENA", *CALIFORNIA*, "ANALYZED" *SATELLITE* "AND" > *DIRECT* "OCEAN" *TEMPERATURE* "DATA" *FROM* "2005" *TO* "2013", > *THEY* "FOUND" *THAT* ""THE" *OCEAN* "ABYSS" *BELOW* "1.24" *MILES* > "(1,995" *METERS)* "HAS" *NOT* "WARMED" *MEASURABLY"*, "THE" *SPACE* > "AGENCY" *ANNOUNCED* "IN" *A* "PRESS" *RELEASE* "ON" *MONDAY*. > "=================================================" > > "AND" *THE* "FACT" *THAT* "TSI" *(TOTAL* "SOLAR" *IRRADIANCE)* "HAS" > *BEEN* "FALLING", *WHICH* "IS" *THE* "MAIN" *CAUSAL* "FACTOR" *FOR* > "THE" *PLANET* "COOLING", *LO* "THESE" *PAST* "18" *YEARS*: > "=================================================" > *HTTPS://EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG/WIKI/SOLAR_IRRADIANCE* "DIFFERENCES" > *BETWEEN* "ACRIM" *AND* "PMOD" *TSI* "COMPOSITES" *ARE* "EVIDENT", > *BUT* "THE" *MOST* "SIGNIFICANT" *IS* "THE" *SOLAR* > "MINIMUM-TO-MINIMUM" *TRENDS* "DURING" *SOLAR* "CYCLES" *21-23*. > "ACRIM" *ESTABLISHED* "AN" *INCREASE* "OF" *+0.037%/DECADE* "FROM" > *1980* "TO" *2000* "AND" *A* "DECREASE" *THEREAFTER*. > > "THE" *IMPLICATIONS* "OF" *INCREASING* "TSI" *DURING* "THE" *GLOBAL* > "WARMING" *OF* "THE" *LAST* "TWO" *DECADES* "OF" *THE* "20TH" > *CENTURY* "ARE" *THAT* "SOLAR" *FORCING* "MAY" *BE* "A" > *SIGNIFICANTLY* "LARGER" *FACTOR* "IN" *CLIMATE* "CHANGE" *THAN* > "REPRESENTED" *IN* "THE" *CMIP5* "GENERAL" *CIRCULATION* "CLIMATE" > *MODELS.[22]* "=================================================" > > "SEE" *THE* "ABOVE", *KO0K*? "THAT" *MEANS* "THE" *TOTAL* "W/M^2" > *HAS* "BEEN" *FALLING* "FOR" *THE* "PAST" *DECADE* "AND" *A* "HALF". > *AND* "THAT" *YOUR* "KLIMATE" *KATASTROPHE* "KOOKS" *INTENTIONALLY* > "IGNORED" *TSI* "SO" *THEY* "COULD" *INSTEAD* "PLACE" *BLAME* "AT" > *THE* "FEET" *OF* "CO2" *AND* "ANTHROPOGENICITY" *TO* "PUSH" *THEIR* > "WHACKADOODLE" *LIBTARD* "KLIMATE" *KATASTROPHE* "KOOK" *AGENDA*. > "IOW", *THEY* "FUCKING" *LIED*, "AND" *YOU'RE* "JUST" *STUPID* > "ENOUGH" *THAT* "YOU" *BOUGHT* "THE" *LIE*. "AND" *NOW* "YOU'RE" > *MAKING* "A" *FOOL* "OF" *YOURSELF* "IN" *DEFENDING* "YOUR" > *DELUSION*. > > "*********************************************************************" > *********************************************************************** > "THAT'S" *CALLED* ""YOU'VE" *BEEN* "BOOTFUCKED" *TO* "HELL" *AND* > "BACK", *YOU* "GIBBERING" *RETARD"*. "NOW" *GO* "CLEAN" *YOURSELF* > "UP", *YOU* "PATHETIC" *PUTZ*. "YOU'RE" *A* "FUCKING" > *EMBARRASSMENT*. > "*********************************************************************" > *********************************************************************** > > "<SNICKER>" You seem upset, ko0kfart. -- alt.usenet.kooks "We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us." Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129] Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007. Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660 Usenet Ruiner Lits Top Assholes on the Net Lits Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits "Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up." AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 10:08 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:09 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:24 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 17:01 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:58 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 08:15 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:23 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 16:47 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 08:10 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 17:38 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:49 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 17:51 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 23:29 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:28 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:16 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 09:11 +0100
2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 05:51 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 12:15 +0100
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:26 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:38 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:40 -0500
Re: 2 T-Annoy proves he is an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 17:45 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 11:59 -0500
Re: T-Annoy proves he is still an asshole (was find your own evidence) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:19 +0100
T-Annoy proves he is still a big asshole (was find your own evidence) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:45 -0500
Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:29 -0500
Re: Jim proves he can't see people impeach themselves je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:31 -0700
Re: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:47 -0500
Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit)) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Caught Kent in a BIG LIE (was: 2 T-Annoy find your own evidence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 15:00 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 06:46 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:50 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 21:07 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:11 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:57 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 21:17 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-22 22:58 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:43 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 00:16 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:05 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:12 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 01:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 17:35 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 05:37 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 08:41 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 06:55 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 07:40 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:34 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-21 16:52 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 22:53 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-22 08:42 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 09:53 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 11:13 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 18:02 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 17:12 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-21 21:36 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:17 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 20:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 19:07 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-23 09:07 +0100
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:08 +0200
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 21:22 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-22 21:31 -0700
Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 10:43 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 19:38 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:08 -0500
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:47 +0200
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut again: "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0700
Re: Breaking news for the Friendly Neighborhood Nut: (was: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 11:38 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 05:19 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-21 16:10 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-22 10:43 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:27 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:59 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:02 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
csiph-web