Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #247832

Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked

From songbird <songbird@anthive.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked
Date 2022-05-03 01:30 +0200
Message-ID <EiNEl-cNrm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <EiG9P-cINS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <EiGtb-cIVC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <EiMoV-cMLP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EiMoV-cMLP-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization the little wild kingdom

Show all headers | View raw


Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> The only difference between package versions 2.2.3-1 and 2.2.3-2 is
> the patch set that Debian applies.


  ok, thanks, i filed a bug report.


  songbird

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2022-05-02 17:30 +0200
  Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-02 17:50 +0200
    Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2022-05-03 00:10 +0200
      Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2022-05-03 00:10 +0200
        Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2022-05-03 01:30 +0200
      Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2022-05-03 11:50 +0200
  [SOLVED] Re: mutt upgrade in testing broke, downgrade worked songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2022-05-03 18:50 +0200

csiph-web