Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1111453
| From | Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1016364: lintian: spelling-error-in-binary should be more precise |
| Date | 2022-07-30 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EOPeN-eMtO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EONmF-eLox-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EONmF-eLox-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 08:30:13AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> When building dhcpcd5 version 9.4.1-4 against Stable, Lintian 2.104.0 reports the following:
>
> I: dhcpcd-base: spelling-error-in-binary usr/sbin/dhcpcd addres address
>
> $ grep -rw addres
> $
>
> i.e. not found.
>
> Lintian really needs to quote the whole stanza where typos are spotted, otherwise, it's like looking for a needle in a hay stack.
Those "spelling error in binary" checks use `strings` on the final
binary, so there isn't really much to see often.
% strings dhcpcd|grep -E 'addres\b'
Duplicate addres
In your case at most you could get this much.
Note that strings can also "leak" from statically linked/inlined functions.
I tried a quick codesearch.d.n lookup, but I couldn't spot a string like
that.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1016364: lintian: spelling-error-in-binary should be more precise Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.racine@iki.fi> - 2022-07-30 07:40 +0200 Bug#1016364: lintian: spelling-error-in-binary should be more precise Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2022-07-30 09:40 +0200
csiph-web