Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1111064

Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

How can I reproduce what you are seeing? The package doesn't use libtool,
and no .la files are produced or included. There should be no reference to
libxbase64. I'm not even sure what that is.


On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >    Package name    : xbase64
> >    Version         : 3.1.2-14
>
> >  xbase64 (3.1.2-14) unstable; urgency=medium
> >  .
> >    * Migrate to debhelper-compat 13:
> >      - debian/control: Add debhelper-compat (= 13).
> >      - Remove debian/compat.
> >      - Add usr/bin/xbase64-config into new debian/not-installed.
> >      - Add usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libxbase64.la to
> >          debian/libxbase64-bin.install.
> >    * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.1.0 (No changes needed).
> >    * debian/copyright:
> >      - Add year 2022 to myself.
> >    * Disable Link time optimization (Closes: #1015707):
> >      - debian/rules: Add optimize=-lto to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS.
> >    * debian/control: Add Rules-Requires-Root: no.
>
> Is there a reason you include the .la file?  From my experience it being
> needed for anything suggests severe borkage, and the Policy concurs:
>
> # [...] these files normally should not be included in the Debian package,
> # since the information they include is not necessary to link with the
> # shared library on Debian and can add unnecessary additional dependencies
> # to other programs or libraries.
>
> It then says:
>
> # If the ".la" must be included, it should be included in the
> # development ("-dev") package, unless the library will be loaded by
> # "libtool"’s "libltdl" library. If it is intended for use with
> # "libltdl", the ".la" files must go in the run-time library package.
>
> libxbase64-bin is neither.
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ You should never, ever, degrade a human being by saying they're
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ a worthless waste of food and air.
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ You should also never anthropomorphize spammers and telemarketers.
>
>

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library Jörg Frings-Fürst <debian@jff.email> - 2022-07-24 17:00 +0200
  Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2022-07-27 04:40 +0200
    Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library Stephen Dennis <brazilofmux@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 05:20 +0200
      Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library Stephen Dennis <brazilofmux@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 05:20 +0200
        Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library Stephen Dennis <brazilofmux@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 05:40 +0200
    Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library Jörg Frings-Fürst <debian@jff.email> - 2022-07-28 22:00 +0200

csiph-web