Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1108170
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Bug#1012601: wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install |
| Date | 2022-06-30 02:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EDPUS-86WS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <EwB0C-3M9d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ExTy9-4ymW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ey1P3-4DzD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EwB0C-3M9d-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Ey1P3-4DzD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 08:27 +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:39:23PM +0200: > > On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 09:39 +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > > the udeb regdb is also slightly obsolete, I'm not sure why it was needed > > > in the first place but it might be possible to use the normal package > > > instead? > > > > Why do you think it's obsolete? It is useful to have this file present > > in the installer. > > Sorry this wasn't clear. I didn't mean obsolete as no longer useful, > just that it is old: wireless-regdb-udeb hasn't been updated in two > years, while the main wireless-regdb package keeps getting updates > regularly. You are comparing wireless-regdb-udeb in stable with wireless-regdb in unstable. Both the regular and udeb packages are outdated in stable, but this should be fixed in the next point release. [...] > Note that for clients (installer usecase), it _also_ doesn't matter: if > an AP uses regulated bands, the client will (should?) rightfully use > these. Yes, I think this is generally what happens. But the kernel wants to load regulatory.db regardless of what mode is being used, so it seemed like a good idea to include it in the installer. This bug shows that that didn't have an entirely positive effect, but it will be fixed. [...] > Yeah, it probably makes more sense to just remove whatever was there in > the post-install script. > I'll leave the resolution to you unless you want/need help with > something. That is what I've now implemented. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Nothing is ever a complete failure; it can always serve as a bad example.
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1012601: wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> - 2022-06-10 02:50 +0200
Bug#1012601: wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2022-06-13 16:50 +0200
Bug#1012601: wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> - 2022-06-14 01:40 +0200
Bug#1012601: wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2022-06-30 02:10 +0200
Bug#1012601: wireless-regdb: alternative broken on debian-installer install Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> - 2022-06-30 02:30 +0200
csiph-web