Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #243343
| From | Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Identity Theft |
| Date | 2021-12-21 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DwV1v-4Pa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <DwMKC-8bJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <DwNnj-bV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DwNwZ-eW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DwO9H-GY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DwPp7-1l3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:34:49 -0500 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote: > On 2021-12-21 at 09:10, Tim Woodall wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2021, tv.debian@googlemail.com wrote: > > > >> Le 21/12/2021 ? 14:24, Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE a ?crit?: > >> > >> It is the second one, "Noscript" in one word [1]. Several > >> look-alike have spawn over the years. I also use Umatrix [2], but > >> it is more complex. > >> > >> For Firefox: > >> [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/noscript/ > >> [2] https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/umatrix/ > >> > >> At least one of those is packaged in Debian. > > > > Will umatrix still work in firefox 91? > > > > Certainly didn't work for me in android v92. > > Is uMatrix on the whitelist of extensions that are allowed on the mobile > version of Firefox? > > Some good number of releases ago, Mozilla completely redid the mobile > version of Firefox, and in the process dropped support for most of the > extension base - as in, they restricted the allowed extensions to only > those in a defined list, and started that list out with a grand total of > *nine* items. (See [1] for some at-the-time commentary on this.) > > I understand that in the time since then they've gradually expanded the > list of allowed extensions, but at nothing like a rapid pace, and with > no sign that they even intend to ever let the broad scope of extensions > be installable (much less usable) for mobile-device Firefox again. > > It's always possible that uMatrix is one of the whitelisted extensions, > but I wouldn't be even slightly surprised if it weren't. > > [1] > https://palant.info/2020/08/31/a-grim-outlook-on-the-future-of-browser-add-ons/ 1) The author of uBlock and uMatrix, Raymond Hill, has abandoned the latter: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uMatrix-issues/issues/291#issuecomment-694988696 https://www.ghacks.net/2020/09/20/umatrix-development-has-ended/ 2) Android uBlock is indeed on the official list of Firefox Recommended Extensions: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/4757633/7dfae8669acc4312a65e8ba5553036/ Celejar
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-20 16:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-20 17:00 +0100
Re: Identity Theft John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-12-20 17:20 +0100
Re: Identity Theft "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbn.25@letterboxes.org> - 2021-12-20 19:10 +0100
Re: Identity Theft John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-12-20 19:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-20 19:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-12-20 20:00 +0100
Re: Identity Theft "Jeremy Nicoll" <jn.ml.dbn.25@letterboxes.org> - 2021-12-20 20:10 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-21 03:00 +0100
Re: Identity Theft John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-12-21 06:00 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-12-21 17:00 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-21 18:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-12-21 19:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-21 20:10 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-12-20 20:30 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-21 03:10 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2021-12-21 03:20 +0100
Re: Identity Theft local10 <local10@tutanota.com> - 2021-12-21 09:20 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 13:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE <zp6cge@gmx.net> - 2021-12-21 14:30 +0100
Re: Identity Theft "tv.debian@googlemail.com" <tv.debian@googlemail.com> - 2021-12-21 14:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2021-12-21 15:20 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Markus Schönhaber <debian-user@list-post.mks-mail.de> - 2021-12-21 16:30 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2021-12-21 16:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-12-21 16:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2021-12-21 19:20 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-12-21 22:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft "tv.debian@googlemail.com" <tv.debian@googlemail.com> - 2021-12-21 14:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-21 18:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-12-25 18:10 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-26 14:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2021-12-27 20:10 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2021-12-21 03:20 +0100
Re: vulnerability classifications (was: Re: Identity Theft) Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2021-12-21 03:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Richmond <richmond@criptext.com> - 2021-12-21 16:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft harryweaver@tutanota.com - 2021-12-21 21:20 +0100
Re: Identity Theft "tv.debian@googlemail.com" <tv.debian@googlemail.com> - 2021-12-21 23:30 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Jeremy Ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> - 2021-12-21 23:50 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-12-22 00:40 +0100
Re: Identity Theft Philippe LeCavalier <support@plecavalier.com> - 2021-12-22 16:00 +0100
Re: Identity Theft rhkramer@gmail.com - 2021-12-21 18:40 +0100
csiph-web