Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1085795

Bug#1001644: [Pkg-sssd-devel] Bug#1001644: libpam-sss: OTP-enabled users do not recieve OTP prompts from pam_sss.so

Show all headers | View raw

On 13.12.2021 19.39, Sam Morris wrote:
 > Package: libpam-sss
 > Version: 2.6.1-1
 > Severity: normal
 >
> In the default configuration, /etc/pam.d/common-auth contains:
> 
>    auth	[success=2 default=ignore]	pam_unix.so nullok
>    auth	[success=1 default=ignore]	pam_sss.so use_first_pass
>    auth    requisite                       pam_deny.so
> 
> This means that pam_unix has the first & only change to prompt the user
> for authentication, and the user gets a single 'Password:' prompt.
> 
> In the Red Hat world, /etc/pam.d/password-auth contains:
> 
>    auth        required                                     pam_env.so
>    auth        required                                     pam_faildelay.so delay=2000000
>    auth        [default=1 ignore=ignore success=ok]         pam_usertype.so isregular
>    auth        [default=1 ignore=ignore success=ok]         pam_localuser.so
>    auth        sufficient                                   pam_unix.so nullok
>    auth        [default=1 ignore=ignore success=ok]         pam_usertype.so isregular
>    auth        sufficient                                   pam_sss.so forward_pass
>    auth        required                                     pam_deny.so
> 
> A local user will hit pam_unix. A non-local user will skip over it and
> be prompted by pam_sss.so.
> 
> An easy fix is to increase the Priority in /usr/share/pam-configs/sss to
> some value > 256. That way, pam-auth-update puts pam_sss before
> pam_unix.
> 
> I tested this, and 'su - localuser' still works.
> 
> Unfortunately I don't know of a way for a user to override this value
> other than by editing that file, which is owned by libpam-sss.
> 
> Is there a good reason that pam_unix has to be first in the module
> stack? If not, could we make this change?
You're asking in the wrong place.. Anyway, pam_sss is not above pam_unix 
in Fedora either, so why should it have a higher priority here?



-- 
t

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Bug#1001644: libpam-sss: OTP-enabled users do not recieve OTP prompts from pam_sss.so Sam Morris <sam@robots.org.uk> - 2021-12-13 19:10 +0100
  Bug#1001644: [Pkg-sssd-devel] Bug#1001644: libpam-sss: OTP-enabled users do not recieve OTP prompts from pam_sss.so Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@debian.org> - 2021-12-15 10:30 +0100

csiph-web