Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #242633
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode |
| Date | 2021-12-02 23:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Dq2r7-4x2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <DpTQR-7Gj-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpWF3-RR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DpWOK-1ak-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Dq05Z-2XZ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <Dq0Sl-3tf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:29:31 -0600 David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > > This thread seems to have gone down a rabbit-hole. > > $ aptitude why os-prober > i grub-common Recommends os-prober (>= 1.33) > $ > > It has stretched the minds of people here to work out how to > make the d-i /avoid/ installing Recommends, so I can't see > why this would suddenly happen to a casual newcomer. > To be fair, it's four or five weeks since I last used an installer, and I certainly got os-prober then. But a few days ago, os-prober was disabled in that very installation after an upgrade. I can therefore easily believe that it could now be omitted on installation. Someone important considers it unnecessary. Again, there was a changelog mentioning this and saying how to work around it, but I feel that a Debian upgrade should not simply disable a piece of necessary and regularly-used software without at least asking the user first. -- Joe
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode frantal@libero.it - 2021-12-01 18:20 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-01 18:30 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-12-01 19:10 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-12-01 19:20 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-12-02 09:10 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-01 23:50 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-12-02 09:30 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Christian Britz <cbritz@t-online.de> - 2021-12-02 14:00 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2021-12-02 17:00 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2021-12-02 17:10 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-12-02 20:40 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-12-02 21:30 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-12-02 23:10 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-12-03 04:00 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2021-12-02 10:00 +0100
Re: Double boot (Windows & Debian) with UEFI mode David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-12-03 04:00 +0100
csiph-web