Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #242068

Re: [OT, deeply] Guix

From Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: [OT, deeply] Guix
Date 2021-11-12 16:10 +0100
Message-ID <DiGlI-6U2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <DgOGJ-3cC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DgQSd-4pq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Dherv-22o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DhpPX-BT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DiaFc-4wh-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


>> I would love to see Debian move towards a model like that of NixOS or
>> Guix.  One of the main benefits I see of those systems is that it has
>> a declarative description of what the system should contain.
> I can't see the point. You can have the Guix package manager¹ now, as
> it allegedly installs on top of "foreign distros" (their term).
> It appears to me that you need well-resourced machines to benefit by its
> ability to have different versions of packages for the system, and
> yet more for individual users. I'm not typically in that position.

The way packages are installed is one part of Guix/Nix.
That's not the part I referred to.

We can have a declarative description of what the system should contain
without having to use NixOS/Guix's system where every package is
installed into a separate subdirectory, and without supporting
multiple-simultaneous-versions.


        Stefan

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[OT, deeply] Guix riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> - 2021-10-26 01:50 +0200
  Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> - 2021-10-26 12:10 +0200
  Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-10-26 15:30 +0200
    Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@zoho.eu> - 2021-11-07 08:30 +0100
    Re: [OT, deeply] Guix didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2021-11-07 12:40 +0100
      Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-11-07 15:00 +0100
        Re: [OT, deeply] Guix David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-11-08 16:10 +0100
          Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-11-08 17:00 +0100
            Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-11-08 22:50 +0100
              Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-11-09 04:30 +0100
                Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2021-11-10 23:30 +0100
                Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-11-11 10:00 +0100
              Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2021-11-09 13:40 +0100
          Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-11-09 04:20 +0100
            Re: [OT, deeply] Guix David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-11-11 06:20 +0100
              Re: [OT, deeply] Guix Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-11-12 16:10 +0100

csiph-web