Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

From	Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)
Date	2021-10-28 05:40 +0200
Message-ID	<Dd4qJ-PQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<DbKX9-1mk-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbLJv-1RP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbKX9-1mk-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <DbLJv-1RP-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> writes:

> Hi all!
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Source: nose
>> Version: 1.3.7-7
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: FTBFS
>> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
>> User: lucas@debian.org
>> Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
>> on amd64.
>>
>> [...]
[snip]
> Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>
>    elpy (U)
>

Please ignore Elpy for now, because it's RC for other reasons, eg:
Python 3.9 broke it, the upstream maintainer has RSI, and I don't think
that it will be fixed anytime soon.  I'm still holding out hope for a
the maintainer's recover and/or a new upstream maintainer, but failing
this, users will migrate to an LSP-based solution--they're already
migrating.

Regards,
Nicholas

Thread

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2021-10-24 14:40 +0200
  Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2021-10-24 15:30 +0200
    Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2021-10-25 00:00 +0200
      Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2021-10-25 20:30 +0200
    Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2021-10-28 05:40 +0200
  Processed: Re: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error  in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-10-25 19:20 +0200
  Bug#997758: marked as pending in nose Dmitry Shachnev <noreply@salsa.debian.org> - 2021-10-30 21:20 +0200
  Processed: Bug#997758 marked as pending in nose "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-10-30 21:20 +0200
  Bug#997758: marked as done (nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error  in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)) "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2021-10-30 22:40 +0200

csiph-web