Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #245253
| From | Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Memory leak |
| Date | 2022-02-11 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <DPLbk-19vY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DPIGt-18b9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DPKff-18WM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2022-02-11 14:52, Celejar wrote: > As I mentioned in another post, I do this occasionally, but I'm not > sure how to interpret the results. I just killed firefox; I got back > about 3.5 GB, but the system is still using about 4.8, and Xorg's usage > hasn't changed: ~ 4436M / 3081M / 105M. Closing Firefox returns 100% of Firefox memory to OS (as long as all the processes are killed). I don't know that it would affect Xorg's usage though. A lot of memory in Linux (and other OS's) is allocated to cache/buffers to speed things up. As programs use more memory the amount for that goes down. For example on my system now with 16GB I have: MiB Mem : 16007.9 total, 4564.8 free, 6306.2 used, 5136.9 buff/cache (with thunderbird, chrome, etc. open). So 5GB is used for cache and 6GB is used for programs and about 4GB is free. Bijan
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Memory leak Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@surfnaked.ca> - 2022-02-11 19:20 +0100
Re: Memory leak piorunz <piorunz@gmx.com> - 2022-02-11 19:30 +0100
Re: Memory leak <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-02-12 09:20 +0100
Re: Memory leak Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 21:00 +0100
Re: Memory leak Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> - 2022-02-11 22:00 +0100
Re: Memory leak Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2022-02-11 22:30 +0100
csiph-web